How the Alt-Right Got Cucked

The Mistaken writes:

Three months into the Trump administration, did Donald Trump make his first epic mistake by launching missiles at Syria? It’s too early to tell, but it looks to me like the alt-right just made what might be a fatal mistake in their reaction to Trump’s Tomahawk Chop.

The alt-right is a bit of an interesting case in image management. In the public eye, perception of the alt-right is based primarily on media slander and hyper-focus on Richard Spencer’s latest antics (“Which restaurant did he get thrown out of now?”). The alt-right labors under the misapprehension that if people just knew more about them, they’d sign up. But Spencer is viewed as their leader and so the alt-right are mainly planted in people’s consciousness as the guy who gave that Trump-is-the-new-Hitler speech in DC to the Nazi stormtroopers goosestepping around the beer hall sieging heil. While no part of that last sentence is actually true, that’s the perception, and perception is everything. After “Hitler night” came the punch in the face. Sometimes, your image controls you.

It wasn’t always this way. For a while the alt-right had a sort of edgy mystique that was really working for it. Nobody knew exactly what it was. It encompassed wildly disparate people like Alex Jones and Milo, a host of bloggers, obscure European political philosophers, and a public intellectual or two. But most important was the fact that this movement, if it was one, was mysteriously and irrevocably linked to Donald Trump. This proximity to enormous power created fascination. The way this works is simple. Donald Trump plus neo-Nazis = inherently interesting. Just neo-Nazis = not that interesting.

This should have been obvious, but somehow, it wasn’t. The alt-right made the fatal mistake of believing their own propaganda. In their hubris, they chortled “We President now” and oblivious to how their message was being received by the public overall, they inferred that somehow it was THEY who were conferring interest and attention on TRUMP, rather than vice versa.

Outside of the political fringes, nobody cares about neo-Nazis, white nationalists, white supremacists, white separatists, or US-based identitarians except to the extent that they actually have political power. The reason for the dramatic increase in coverage of the alt-right was almost completely because of the media’s desire to tarnish Trump through guilt by association. Of course, a secondary reason is that the thinkers on the alt-right do actually have important things to say about mass immigration, race relations, the left, feminism, US foreign policy, the breakdown of tradition, and many other topics. But most of those things could be and are said by people who don’t also LARP about how we’re at the cusp of creating a white ethnostate; expelling all Jews from Christian nations; installing a new thousand-year Reich and other things that aren’t about to happen. But it was a big tent movement because for awhile it became a movement to elect Donald Trump.

But then, when Trump did the very first thing the alt-right really didn’t like, the alt-right became haters. Not just of Trump’s actions, which would be reasonable, but of Trump himself. “We Not President Now” apparently.

Within a day or two of the missile strike many of the major figures associated with the alt-right lost their minds. As I watched their hysterics something familiar struck me; something I’d seen from other people, somewhere else. Then it hit me. They were acting exactly like SJWs.

hitlerHis smile and optimism: gone

First, there was the virtue signaling. The “No War with Syria” Facebook pictures. People changing their profile picture to Assad and swearing allegiance to the Baath Party. The angry, hysterical ranting at Trump, so familiar from our friends on the SJW left. The loud public pronouncements of betrayal. The desperate, depressed gloom, mixed with self-righteous rage. The new identification as victims. And of course, it wouldn’t be the alt-right without the immediate scapegoating of Jews.

This would have been funny if it wasn’t so… ah fuck it, it was funny. Here were a bunch of people who were convinced that Trump was “one of them” – the most amazing part of which is the fact that anyone would think a Real Estate billionaire force of nature is “one of us” people trading memes on the Internet 24/7, but never mind that.  The other incredible thing was that many on the alt-right seem to have actually thought that Trump was if not anti-Semitic, at least willing or eager to go to war with “the Jews.” Somehow, it failed to dawn on these stalwarts that having a Jewish son-in-law for an advisor, whom your daughter converted to marry, who bore your Jewish grandchildren, might make you a bit unsympathetic to people whose understanding of politics largely centers on the idea that “the Jews are the problem.” It was also bewildering that some of the very people most concerned about Jews and Jewish influence thrilled to Trump’s fiery broadsides against globalism, written by the Jewish Stephen Miller. The fact that Steve Bannon’s Breitbart was clearly as pro-Likkud Zionist as it gets somehow was overlooked, as were Bannon’s close relationships with Pamela Geller, Frank Gaffney, and other hardcore pro-Zionists who hate Iran (and thus by implication Assad).  But “Jew President Now” just isn’t as catchy.

So, suddenly discovering the reality that We President Now is not actually someone who stays up late at night worrying about miscegenation and the pernicious influence of Herbert Marcuse; the alt-right, or large parts of it, decided that Trump had betrayed them all. This meant that he is in fact, a cuck, and his closeness to Jews (particularly Kushner) must be what cucked him. Various thought leaders within the alt-right have now denounced the no-longer-God Emperor and signaled their complete separation from the Trump movement.

To which of course, Trump and his loyal supporters must think “good riddance.”

If we think seriously about numbers and voters for a moment, what is obvious is that the number of white men who like Donald Trump is vastly larger than the number who like Richard Spencer or any other alt-right luminary. White men being the principal source of alt-right support, this suggests that all other groups also prefer Donald Trump over the alt-right. This means that if alt-right figures split off from the Trump movement, they become hugely outnumbered by Trump supporters in every possible demographic category (with the possible exception of traps).

In terms of what Scott Adams calls persuasion, the alt-right leaving Trump is highly positive, for Trump. Trump’s largest persuasion problem from before the election until a few weeks ago was the narrative that Trump is Hitler. While nothing about this comparison makes any sense, much of the reason it persisted was because of the assumed ties between Trump and the alt-right, which is certainly more Hitler-like than anything most people have seen for a while. With the alt-right denouncing Trump, the Trump is Hitler narrative dies. This leaves Trump able to do things like strengthen border security, deport illegals, and change immigration policies without being tarnished by accusations of white supremacy or racial hatred. This is an enormously positive development for Trump and his (non alt-right) supporters. Rather than Trump trying to “shore up his base” which the alt-right mistakenly think is themselves, Trump is more likely to be grateful that the people denouncing him can no longer be described as his base.

Meanwhile, the alt-right’s own persuasion just crashed and burned. Far right groups’ main appeal is on ideological grounds, but the majority of Americans are not particularly ideological. Whatever success the alt-right has had in the US in the last couple of years is due to some good ideas, a lot of funny memes, people’s frustration with political correctness boiling over, but mainly from how the movement tied itself to the Trump train.

In essence, a far right movement gains appeal by being associated with the characteristics that the far right venerate: power, authority, force, and the people. By denouncing Trump, the alt-right just cut itself off from all of these things. Given the unfortunate reality of Spencer punchings and generally being beaten in the streets, without this link to state power, the alt-right must rely on its own paramilitary force, which is so far largely non-existent. Without being linked to any reasonable displays of authority or force, the alt-right look like wimps.

Take an already wimpy looking movement whom most people don’t like anyway, and then have them STAGE AN ANTI-WAR PROTEST against a war that isn’t probably even happening. And then have that anti-war protest be shut down by hysterical commie Jew La Raza BLM feminist transgender antifa types. Not good persuasion at all.

The people who were only a few weeks ago chanting “helicopter rides” are now posing as a “peace movement,” albeit one that also wants to peacefully expel everybody from the country that isn’t them, and that only cares about military strikes against “muh Assad” while ignoring more lethal US air strikes in Yemen or Iraq. There is of course a strong case to be made against US intervention in Syria, but that’s not the message getting across. Transformed from Trump-supporting alphas to anti-war betas, the alt-right’s narrative is now just another sad story of white men being cuckolded. Trump was their waifu and now she’s fucking the Jews.

0d8ef14877a03cea

About The Mistaken

I may be wrong.
This entry was posted in Politics and Economics and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to How the Alt-Right Got Cucked

  1. slumlord says:

    “It wasn’t always this way. For a while the alt-right had a sort of edgy mystique that was really working for it. Nobody knew exactly what it was. It encompassed wildly disparate people like Alex Jones and Milo, a host of bloggers, obscure European political philosophers, and a public intellectual or two. But most important was the fact that this movement, if it was one, was mysteriously and irrevocably linked to Donald Trump.”

    I disagree. It was there before Trump and was gaining traction. The huge disaster was the influence of the Natsocs and prole entryists who really dumbed down the quality. I don’t think many realise just how much damage Spencer did.

    As for Trump alienating his base, I think that you’ll find these knuckleheads far more representative of their values than you’d like to think. Ann Coulter and Steve Sailer have a good grasp of the “man in the street.” They’ve not actually been endorsing him(Trump) either.

    Like

  2. The Mistaken says:

    Trump’s approval rating rose slightly or stayed the same after the airstrikes. Depending on the poll, 53-57% of Americans approved of the strikes.

    Bizarre as it may be, the overwhelming majority of Americans think Assad poses a threat to the US. https://anepigone.blogspot.com/2017/04/overwhelming-majority-thinks-assad.html This number goes up to 80% for Trump voters.

    Arguably, Trump’s base is married people. https://anepigone.blogspot.com/2017/03/marriage-and-gender-gaps-in.html though single white men, protestants, and Mormons disproportionately supported him. https://anepigone.blogspot.com/2017/03/detailed-demographic-breakdown-of-2016.html

    I would bet that these groups also disproportionately favor military strikes.

    I agree with you about the dumbing down that occurred.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. sibe says:

    Ann Coulter, Michael Savage, Marine Le Pen and Nigel Farage also came out strongly against the air strikes.

    Like

    • The Mistaken says:

      And correctly so. But without repudiating Trump overall.
      I also was against the air strikes. But I don’t view them as a betrayal. Just great power politics as usual.

      Liked by 1 person

  4. JV says:

    Is everyone here really on board with the Game/politics thing? I find it unbelievably annoying, like a male version of a typical Jezebel article, ticking off buzzwords.

    Like

    • The Mistaken says:

      If you’re going to mock a movement, much more fun to use their own lingo while doing it.

      But there is certainly something to the alpha/beta distinction.

      Like

      • JV says:

        Nah, it’s more fun to characterize them as exactly what they despise.

        The alpha/beta distinction is too neat and reductionist for me. Makes a nice cozy Grand Unified Theory to explain anything and everything in order to make us feel better, but it falls short, IMO.

        Like

  5. Glengarry says:

    How unfortunate that this also abandons the path out of the burning building. Kushnerism is not the way forward and cuckservative normies are not the people to oppose it.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s