Fenster writes:
I don’t doubt too much that the IRS’s special treatment of Tea Party organizations had political motivations, ideological if not partisan. And that’s bad, bad bad let’s all agree.
And maybe Ross Douthat is right that the story is darker yet:
Where might an enterprising, public-spirited I.R.S. agent get the idea that a Tea Party group deserved more scrutiny from the government than the typical band of activists seeking tax-exempt status? Oh, I don’t know: why, maybe from all the prominent voices who spent the first two years of the Obama era worrying that the Tea Party wasn’t just a typically messy expression of citizen activism, but something much darker — an expression of crypto-fascist, crypto-racist rage, part Timothy McVeigh and part Bull Connor, potentially carrying a wave of terrorist violence in its wings.
Could be, though I’d prefer no wholesale rush to judgment on motivations. It is possible that a more nuanced explanation will emerge, if you will forgive me preferring fact to spin in the age of Shawn Hannity and The Daily Kos.
But why are political outfits like Tea Party groups tax-exempt to begin with? Ezra Klein, whom I often disagree with, has it right, I think, in arguing that it was not a good idea in the first instance to have awarded tax-exempt designations to those groups.






