“The Night Manager” (2016)

Blowhard, Esq. writes:

Finally caught up with this wonderful BBC series. If Guy Ritchie’s THE MAN FROM UNCLE does classic Bond better than the recent Bonds, then THE NIGHT MANAGER does realistic Bond better than the recent Bonds. All of the Bond trappings are here: the hero, the villain, the girl, the henchmen, Moneypenny, globe-trotting, advanced military technology, beautiful clothes, a casino, Swiss bank accounts, and they even squeeze in a vodka martini. But it’s all wrapped up Le Carré-esque plausibility. Currently streaming on Amazon Prime.

Posted in Movies, Television | Tagged , | 7 Comments

A Walk Through Palmyra (or, Architecture and Color)

Fenster writes:

This post continues a series dealing with impressions of place.  There was the slightly down at the heels Moody Street in Waltham, Massachusetts, where the main impression on a dark early evening in winter was the abundant light from the old-fashioned glass windows showcasing shops and the abundant life therein.  There was trendy Williamsburg in Brooklyn, also somewhat down at the heels despite its reputation, where the dominant impression was the residue left by competing tribes.  And there was the more elegant Ghent, in Belgium, where the doors were noteworthy.  This time it is Palmyra, New York.

This post can also be thought of as a continuation of Paleo Retiree’s series here on architecture and color.  I haven’t sought his permission to use the term but I hope he will agree–since I know he knows Palmyra–that its use is appropriate here.

Continue reading →

Posted in Architecture | Tagged , | 7 Comments

Architecture and Color

Paleo Retiree writes:

Posted in Architecture | Tagged | Leave a comment

Non-Naked Ladies of the Week: The Playboy Bunny

Blowhard, Esq. writes:

May these bunnies put a spring in your step. Happy Easter.

Continue reading →

Posted in Sex | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

SuperSJWMan

Epaminondas writes:

It would seem that Superman has acquired some amazing new SJW powers. The Z-Man discusses the media spiral and how it usually ends.

Posted in Politics and Economics | Leave a comment

Signs O’ The Times

Fenster writes:

signo1signo9

sign o8signo7signo6signo5signo4signo3sign o2

Posted in Personal reflections | 1 Comment

Reversal of Fortune?

Fenster writes:

The alt-right and the Trumpist “Right”–not the same thing–have in common a skeptical view of the effectiveness of the Rest of the Right.  To the alt-right the Rest of the Right consists of “cuckservatives”.  To the Trumpist “Right” (in quotes because it is not really right-wing in any conventional sense) they are sinecurists.

This is Michael Anton, writing as Decius:

Conservatives spend at least several hundred million dollars a year on think-tanks, magazines, conferences, fellowships, and such, complaining about this, that, the other, and everything. And yet these same conservatives are, at root, keepers of the status quo. Oh, sure, they want some things to change. They want their pet ideas adopted—tax deductions for having more babies and the like. Many of them are even good ideas. But are any of them truly fundamental? Do they get to the heart of our problems? . . . The whole enterprise of Conservatism, Inc., reeks of failure. Its sole recent and ongoing success is its own self-preservation. . . .If you’re among the subspecies conservative intellectual or politician, you’ve accepted—perhaps not consciously, but unmistakably—your status on the roster of the Washington Generals of American politics.

Anton would change that power equation, and supported the election of Trump to that end.  Trump was elected.  And?

To paraphrase Ed Koch, how’s he doin’?

Let’s not take sides on the wisdom of his actions here.  Let’s just ask if he is doing things and moving in the promised direction.  To judge from the press he is failing.  Other accounts suggest he is succeeding.  Here’s Roger Kimball in American Greatness:

The Keystone pipeline. The enforcement of the country’s immigration laws. The Executive Order reorganizing, and trimming, the Executive Branch. The attack on the regulatory overreach that has stifled business and hampered freedom. The proposed budget, which zeroes out such dinosaurs as the National Endowments for the Arts and the Humanities. The shake up of the Department of Education with Betsy DeVos—and look for lots more there soon. The advent of a United States Ambassador with backbone as our representative to the UN. The confirmation of Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court. And on and on. The media keeps telling us how chaotic and disorganized the Trump administration is. Don’t look now, but the most impressive Cabinet in decades has been acting with astonishing speed to keep the promises Trump made on the campaign trail.

So what is it?  Success or failure?  To paraphrase Robert Towne:

GITTES I said the truth!

EVELYN — he’s a failure —

Gittes slaps her again.

EVELYN (continuing) — he’s a success.

Gittes slaps her again.

EVELYN (continuing) — a failure.

He hits her again.

EVELYN (continuing) A failure, a success —

He belts her finally, knocking her into a cheap Chinese vase which shatters and she collapses on the sofa, sobbing.

GITTES I said I want the truth.

EVELYN (almost screaming it) He’s a failure and a success! . . .understand, or is it too tough for you?

As my parents said to me often: we’ll see.

But it could be that we will see a kind of reversal of fortune.  Perhaps the new script will call for the left (or what passes for the left–don’t get me started) to be the new Washington Generals, easing gracelessly into a spot where they must accept changes as long as they are able to describe them as failures.

Posted in Politics and Economics | Tagged , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Quote Du Jour: The Irreconcilables

Blowhard, Esq. writes:

There can be no more formidable symptom of our time, and none more menacing to popular government, than the growth of Irreconcilable bodies within the mass of the population. Church and State are alike convulsed by them; but, in civil life, Irreconcilables are associations of men who hold political opinions as men once held religious opinions. They cling to their creed with the same intensity of belief, the same immunity from doubt, the same confident expectation of blessedness to come quickly, which characterises the disciples of an infant faith. They are doubtless a product of democratic sentiment; they have borrowed from it its promise of a new and good time at hand, but they insist on the immediate redemption of the pledge, and they utterly refuse to wait until a popular majority gives effect to their opinions. Nor would the vote of such a majority have the least authority with them, if it sanctioned any departure from their principles.

— Henry Sumner Maine, Popular Government

Posted in Politics and Economics | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Architecture and Color

Paleo Retiree writes:

Posted in Architecture | Tagged | Leave a comment

Conrad Black, William Deresiewicz, and David Goodhart. What Manner of Coming Conflict?

Fenster writes:

Three authors have proposed a way to think about current and coming conflicts.  Conrad Black sees the conflict as between the religious instincts of the people and the secular worldview of the elite.  William Deresiewicz thinks that lurking behind today’s elite secularism is a new kind of religion, setting up the conditions for a kind of religious conflict.  And David Goodhart sees the conflict in largely secular terms.  Let’s look at each.

Continue reading →

Posted in Education, Philosophy and Religion, Politics and Economics, Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 6 Comments