Agree with Steve that its use forever has seemingly been about wartime and post-war Euro anomie, philosophy tinged by good tobacco, The Wages of Fear, etc. etc. Interesting, though, that the most common usage recently seems to be in reference to Iran’s “existential” threat to Israel–e.g., existential having to do simply with existence and not a post-war hangover. A scan of Google News suggests that while the former notion–shorthand for “oh, what’s the point?” still has traction, the latter, more pedestrian notion is picking up steam. For instance, the Arlington Planetarium is now reopening after facing an “existential threat”.
No wonder I’ve always been confused about the word.
I understand the philosophical usage but only recognize the more mundane usage as ‘correct’.
Of course it’s all about the same thing, non?
Paris, 1940s, cigarette smoke, sidewalk cafe, coffee, wine.
LikeLike
Any college campus, 1960s, marajuana smoke, dorm rooms, loud music, tye-dye shirts.
LikeLike
A particular flavour of affectation.
LikeLike
Agree with Steve that its use forever has seemingly been about wartime and post-war Euro anomie, philosophy tinged by good tobacco, The Wages of Fear, etc. etc. Interesting, though, that the most common usage recently seems to be in reference to Iran’s “existential” threat to Israel–e.g., existential having to do simply with existence and not a post-war hangover. A scan of Google News suggests that while the former notion–shorthand for “oh, what’s the point?” still has traction, the latter, more pedestrian notion is picking up steam. For instance, the Arlington Planetarium is now reopening after facing an “existential threat”.
LikeLike
No wonder I’ve always been confused about the word.
I understand the philosophical usage but only recognize the more mundane usage as ‘correct’.
Of course it’s all about the same thing, non?
LikeLike
Black turtlenecks.
LikeLike
Who cares? Everything is meaningless.
LikeLike