Architecture Du Jour

Blowhard, Esq. writes:

Bojnice_(Bojnitz)_Castle_(by_Pudelek)

Bojnice Castle, Slovakia.

Click on the image to enlarge.

Posted in Architecture | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

“Ex Machina” (2015)

Blowhard, Esq. writes:

Ex-Machina-Gallery-02

I’ve been a fan of Alex Garland since I read his novel The Beach years ago. The Danny Boyle adaptation was lame, but I did enjoy the Boyle-Garland collaborations 28 DAYS LATER and SUNSHINE. Oh yeah, the Garland-written-and-partially-directed DREDD reboot was pretty boss, too. So I was primed to enjoy EX MACHINA and did for the most part. The movie plays like HER meets FRANKENSTEIN but written as a European chamber play/sex thriller. But the movie could’ve lost 20 minutes and I thought the ending was predictable. The actors are all interesting. The growing sexual tension and manipulation between Domhnall Gleeson and Alicia Vikander is fun to watch, and I particularly liked Oscar Isaac, here playing a cross between Sergey Brin, Mark Zuckerberg, and Steve Jobs. This is the third movie I’ve seen with him (the other two being INSIDE LLEWYN DAVIS and THE TWO FACES OF JANUARY) and I’ve come to like him quite a bit. He has those sad, angry, contemptuous eyes that make me wonder what he’s going to say and do next.

Eddie Pensier writes:

machina_a

EX MACHINA surprised me on several levels. First of all, the pace is fairly meditative: not a lot strictly “happens” in the first hour, and it’s definitely more talk than action.  (It could, without a lot of trouble, be converted into a stage play with three speaking roles not unlike SPEED-THE-PLOW.) Secondly, it operates on an intellectual level higher than most sci-fi movies. There are some pretty deep meditations on the nature of consciousness and humanity, and the film doesn’t pretend to have the answers to every question–the ending leaves a lot of ambiguity in the viewer’s mind. Garland and his cinematographer Rob Hardy produce some stunning visuals, my favorite being the (mild spoiler) Bluebeard-like scene where Caleb discovers closetsful of Nathan’s previous, discarded AI experiments (end mild spoiler).

Of the three excellent main actors, I was most impressed by Alicia Vikander’s Ava, who pitches her performance at just the right level of is-she-or-isn’t-she to intrigue us (and Gleeson’s appealingly schlubby Caleb). However, her bird-like head movements, each accompanied by tiny electronic sounds, along with the glowing plasticky sheen of her artificial skin, never lets us forget what (who?) she really is. Oscar Isaac too manages to keep the smarmy technobro trappings to a minimum while bristling with obvious intelligence.

Sax von Stroheim writes:

ExMachina

Based on his previous works, my take on Alex Garland was that he was trying to smuggle in ideas, themes, and characters from J.G. Ballard’s science fiction novels into more standard genre movies. This was clearest with his screenplay for SUNSHINE, partly because the turn from Ballardian sci-fi to a last act that devolved into standard scary movie shtick was so pronounced. So, I thought that on his own movie, working on a smaller scale, without the need for the conventional tactics that marred the end of SUNSHINE, he’d give us something that hewed closer to the Ballard novels that seem to be his major inspiration. And that’s kind of what we get in EX MACHINA: an Everyman engaging in a battle of wills with a Man Who Would Be God, with the evolution of humanity (or post-humanity) at stake. But it’s only “kind of” what we get, because, as it turns out, even on his own, working on a smaller scale, Garland goes for a turn towards more conventional genre fare by the end, which doesn’t quite mar the movie, but makes it more familiar, and more comfortable, than the sci-fi novels (by Ballard and others) that inspired it. While I can’t say I didn’t like it — it’s smart, the acting is terrific, there’s a low-rent Edgar Ulmer vibe to the production that I really dig — I also wasn’t terribly moved by it — it engaged my intellect more than my imagination (it doesn’t help that it looks pretty cruddy). It’s one of those movies that I didn’t mind sitting through, but where, on the way home, I couldn’t help think of other, similar movies that I had liked better (Ulmer’s own, for example, or, thinking of other recent small scale indie sci-fi, Brandon Cronenberg’s ANTIVIRAL). And, although it’s completely unfair and unreasonable of me, I guess I’m a little disappointed that Garland’s own ambitions aren’t quite as grand (or at least as refined) as I had imagined them to be.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , | 4 Comments

DON CARLO, Metropolitan Opera (Review)

Eddie Pensier* writes:

NOBODY expects the Spanish Inquisition!

I’ve always had big problems with Verdi’s Don Carlo. It always struck me less as a cohesive music-theatre piece and more of a collection of scenes and arias, rather like a concert program. It never really juggles the political drama, family drama, and romance aspects to my satisfaction. The title character is rarely done justice. The million different editions provoke infuriatingly pedantic arguments among opera nerds over which is best and Most Authentic™. And it features possibly the lamest, most pathetic cop-out of an ending to soil a major opera by a genius composer with (usually) unerring theatrical instincts.

Shame then, that the music is so damn good. Pretty much the perfect mix of arias, duets, and ensembles. Just the right amount of mid-period Verdi grandeur balanced with hushed moments of introspection. I love hearing all the parts of Don Carlo, but I hate sitting through Don Carlo, if that makes sense.

I did though, on the opening night of the Metropolitan Opera’s revival of Nicholas Hytner’s production on March 31. It’s described on the Met website as “handsome”, and I guess that’s true in the way you tell an 8-year old “My, aren’t you a handsome boy!” Nothing particularly pretty or striking about it, but nothing hideously ugly either, and it mostly allows the action to hew closely to the text, for which one ought to be grateful in this day and age. There wasn’t a whole lot of stage direction, and the singers engaged in more than a little “park and bark” without a theatrical hand to guide them.

The exception was Ferruccio Furlanetto, who is justly famous for his portrayal of King Philip. Furlanetto’s coal-black bass has the right authoritative weight to deliver Hardass Philip, but manages to soften with the sadness/humiliation/old-man exhaustion necessary to make Romantic Philip genuinely empathetic.

Barbara Frittoli is the real deal: a serious Verdi lyric soprano with a glittering voice and a lovely, regal bearing. Is her voice a teensy bit more tattered than it was a decade ago? Sure. But she sang with such exquisite attention to detail that I was willing to forgive the occasional pinch in tone.

Dmitri Hvorostovsky is a known quantity, he of the flowing white hair and  velvety chocolate-brown baritone and sadomasochistic music videos and inhumanly long phrasing. The thing about that last one though: you get so seduced by the entire paragraphs sung in one breath, that you don’t notice the hilariously loud, labored gasps for breath in between them, until you purposely listen for them. And once you do, you can never un-hear them. Even so, there’s probably nobody on earth singing Posa this well, and he was a credit to the cast.

The Eboli of Ekaterina Gubanova was well-sung but a bit cold: she lacked the vengeful, bitchy touch that elevates the best Ebolis. Yonghoon Lee cut a dashing figure as Carlo and has a real, proper Italianate voice (if only mediocre Italian pronunciation) but he was the one most handcuffed by the lack of effective direction and often looked adrift.

Veteran basso James Morris was a great if not hugely elegant Philip in the prime of his career. Here he took the role of the Grand Inquisitor and made a growly, menacing meal of every line.

At this point I could easily churn out more words about how impeccable, stylistically correct, and sympathetic the conducting of Yannick Nézet-Séguin was. But I’ll simply quote my seatmate, who got it in a nutshell:

He did everything he was supposed to do, and nothing he wasn’t supposed to do.

Quite.

*A few readers have been kind enough to enquire about my absence from these pages for the last several months. I have been caring for a bedridden parent for much of that time, and my writing muse took the opportunity to go on an extended vacation. Can’t guarantee that she’ll stick around, but I’ll do my best to keep her nearby and well-fed.
Posted in Music, Performers, Personal reflections, The Good Life | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Art Du Jour (Anzac Day 2015 Edition)

Eddie Pensier writes:

Peter Wegner, Dog With Gas Mask, 2013

Related

  • Previous ANZAC-themed ADJ here and here.
Posted in Art | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Mad Men Notes: S7, Ep10 — “The Forecast”

Blowhard, Esq. writes:

draperpenthouse

1. Don has sold his penthouse — for $85k, or $492k in 2015 dollars — and is now homeless. “This place reeks of failure,” his real estate agent says. Pardon me, but I’ll take a half mil “failure” any time.

2. California geography shout-outs this episode: Beverly Wilshire Hotel, Palos Verdes, and Biltmore in Santa Barbara. I’ve been to a couple of hoity-toity lawyer events at the Beverly Wilshire and it is indeed a swanky place. We also get accurate directions to Hanna-Barbera studios, right off the 101 in Universal City — “Sunset to Highland to Cahuenga”.

travelers

3. Traveler’s cheques have pretty much disappeared, right? I remember my family getting some for a trip to Canada in 1986. I’m guessing we were the last people to use them.

bgst

4. Happy to see Captain Pike (aka Bruce Greenwood) show up to woo Joan. Now how soon before some geek argues that MAD MEN and STAR TREK take place in the same universe?

joanbluedress

5. Joan in that blue dress.

ted-mad-men-mustache

6. It’s probably unlikely, but I’m hoping we get more from Ted Chaough before the season is out. I liked when he was the cocky pissant challenging Don.

Oak-Room-Plaza

7. New York geography: The Oak Room at The Plaza and we find out that Joan lives on 12th St.

8. I don’t have a screenshot, but we get brief glimpses of The New Yorker and Newsweek magazines in this episode. Some of my UR comrades have worked for both of those publications.

madmen-mathis

9. My favorite line of the episode goes to Mathis who yells at Don, “You don’t have any character, you’re just handsome. Stop kidding yourself!” Take it from me, someone who has quit two jobs in the past year — there are few things more satisfying than telling off a shithead boss as you walk out the door.

sallydisgusted

10. My second favorite scene was watching Sally’s teenaged friend throw herself at Don and Don being only too happy to flirt back. Jesus, Sally is gonna be one fucked up teenager, isn’t she?

Posted in Television | Tagged , | 2 Comments

“The Last Artist in New York City”

Paleo Retiree writes:

Despite all the bitching and carping we here at UR like to indulge in, we aren’t just a bunch of negativity-mongers. (Critics, patooie.) Many of us make our own creative contributions too. Try this, and this, and this, and this, and this, and this. In fact, please give ’em a try. Expressing yourself may be easier than ever these days, but audiences are getting harder and harder to scare up.

Recently my wife and I were delighted to see a video pop up on YouTube of a performance of a short play of ours. The actress is Karen Grenke, a souful/funny genius who always makes our material look its best, and the director was Jason Jacobs, a miracle maker who we’ve worked with many times and who we look forward to working with again. The event where the performance took place was a celebration at the Nuyuorican Poets Café of the launch of “Best Monologues from Best American Short Plays.” (Our piece was also selected for “Best American Short Plays, 2008-2009.”) Hey, we’re award-winners, doncha know. Hope you enjoy. And if you don’t: for God’s sake either don’t tell me about it or lie. Honesty isn’t always a virtue.

Posted in Books Publishing and Writing, Performers, Theater | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

Architecture Du Jour

Blowhard, Esq. writes:

Madrid_-_Palacio_de_comunicaciones_01

Palacio de Cibeles, Madrid. More here.

Click on the image to enlarge.

Posted in Architecture | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Moi on Book Publishing

Paleo Retiree writes:

Steve Sailer was kind enough to highlight a comment I made on his blog about the demographics of the American book publishing world from 1985ish to 2001ish, a stretch when I was professionally covering the field. (I dropped about a half a dozen comments on Steve’s posting, so if you’re in that kind of mood, scrawl down and give those a look too.) Ah, the memories … Especially of the hundreds of fancy lunches I enjoyed, paid for by money that in a just world would have been going to authors instead of into my belly. Although I couldn’t be more happy about being retired, I do miss those fabulous meals — Manhattan’s great restaurants are really something to experience. In any case: many thanks to Steve, who these days always seems to be on an inspired tear of one sort or another. If you value his work as much as I do, why not make a donation?

Related

  • You can access some of my other thoughts about publishing and literature at my old blog via this link.
Posted in Books Publishing and Writing | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

“Cultural Literacy for Religion”

Paleo Retiree writes:

cultural

I enjoyed Mark Berkson’s hyper-basic (one-half to four lectures per major religion) Great Courses series very much. My beefs with it first, but only because complaining is so much more fun and easy than praising. It wasn’t the anthropological lecture series of my dreams. I’d have enjoyed some looks at animism, tribal beliefs, and Egyptian, Mesoamerican and Mesopotamian religions, as well as a few tours through the main ongoing debates over what’s a religion and what’s not. Is our current regime of multiculturalism / feminism / diversity / PC / neoliberalism taking on some characteristics of a religion, for instance? (I sure think so.) The course’s worthy “If only we understood each other we’d get along better” framing struck me as pretty silly. Why shouldn’t intellectual curiosity be understood to be reason enough to justify going through such a series? And, perhaps predictably, Berkson’s treatment of Islam seems as concerned with preventing listeners from hating the religion as with presenting and explaining it. Berkson in fact seems to have intended his Islam lectures as a corrective to some imagined wave of anti-Islam vindictiveness. Since despite checking the news most days I’ve remained unaware of the angry mobs in the U.S. that are apparently clamoring for attacks on Muslims, I did roll my eyes a few times during these particular lectures.

OK, it’s a pretty earnest experience. But, all my ungallant carping to one side, I also found it to be a super-clear and very informative series of talks. If you’re like me, you’ve run across 3/4 of this material before but only in a scattershot, higgledy-piggledy fashion. Berkson lines it all up in very easy-to-digest order. He speaks clearly and well; he has a lot of enthusiasm as well as a major gift for organization; and he supplies just the right amount of historical context-setting to make the beliefs, dogmas and developments comprehensible. And for what the course wants to be he gets the generalization-level just right. That strikes me as a very big accomplishment. (A writerly note: It’s fascinating how the demands of speaking hyper-basically can — somewhat paradoxically? — make a person come up with interesting things to say, as well as interesting ways of saying them.) For a few minutes, my head felt very clear, and that’s something I’m always very grateful for. Verdict: A first-class (if slightly, and forgivably, square) shot at Major Religions of the World 101.

Related

Posted in Books Publishing and Writing, Education, History, Philosophy and Religion | Tagged , , , | 25 Comments

Art Du Jour

Blowhard, Esq. writes:

Bernardo_Bellotto_(View_of_the_Grand_Canal_and_the_Dogana)

Bernardo Bellotto, “View of the Grand Canal and the Dogana,” 1743.

Click on the image to enlarge.

Posted in Architecture, Art | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment