“Death Race”

Fabrizio del Wrongo writes:


“Death Race” is aimed at fans of the “Fast & Furious” franchise. It’s a multi-ethnic car movie that trades on the pumped-up sexiness of its stars, one of which, that scowling peacock Tyrese Gibson, is a “F & F” regular. The movie is broadly based on the 1975 “Death Race 2000,” a gleeful live-action take on the cartoon “Wacky Races.” This version takes itself more seriously. It stakes a claim to the tradition of the prison escape drama — it’s a bit like “Brute Force” tailored to the age of Xbox. Dutifully, writer-director Paul W. S. Anderson hits all the prison-movie beats, and he replaces the pop palette of the original with a steely combination of grays and blues; it’s a choice meant to communicate toughness and grit. As a satirist, however, Anderson is soft: though “Death Race” makes some stabs at spoofing corporate greed, it never misses an opportunity to flaunt its sponsors’ logos in fawning, Garbo-worthy close-up.

Anderson is a leading purveyor of the video game style of movie making. He designs movies in segments or levels, then has his characters scuttle through them like the ghosts and hungry cheese wheel from Pac-Man. This may explain why I’ve always found his work to be most satisfying at the micro level: he’s a talented stylist, one with the smarts to connect his visuals to larger themes and ideas, but his movies tend to fall apart when considered as narrative wholes. Though the screenplay for “Death Race” is a bit more persuasive than what Anderson usually comes up with, the picture sputters after the initial racing sequence. It starts to feel repetitive, and you might find your interest waning even as you’re impressed by the abundant technical wizardry.

That wizardry is most evident during the racing sequences. The editing, by Niven Howie, has a staccato lyricism, individual shots blipping into your consciousness and remaining there just long enough to inform your understanding of the following shot. Anderson is one of the few filmmakers capable of working the prevailing “shaky-cam” aesthetic into something cohesive and intelligible — to use it as more than a driver of you-are-there jitters (Olivier Megaton is another). The action in “Death Race” isn’t exactly spatially comprehensible — Anderson is more of a cutter than a camera mover — but it has a narrative and temporal connectedness that sustains rather than short circuits your involvement.

Star Jason Statham is the least conceited of action heroes; he always seems to be doing an internal double-take. Though he’s fine here — he’s playing a mystery driver who goes by the codename Frankenstein — the movie might have made better use of his gift for affable self-parody. His personality is diluted. It doesn’t help that his character is burdened with a solemn backstory revolving around the death of his wife. Like “Premium Rush,” which I wrote about back here, “Death Race” just doesn’t need that extra layer of motivation. It’s fat on the bone, and it slows everything down. As Statham’s forced partner and nemesis, the chilly prison warden Hennessey, Joan Allen makes a virtue out of dubious plastic surgery: her weirdly immobile face completes the portrait of corporate and bureaucratic soullessness. She’s a whole different sort of Frankenstein.

About Fabrizio del Wrongo

Recovering liberal arts major. Unrepentant movie nut. Aspiring boozehound.
This entry was posted in Movies, Performers and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to “Death Race”

  1. Fun review. I generally like Jason Statham too. But Paul W.S. Anderson … It took me a couple of minutes after reading your review to remember that in fact I’ve watched this movie. I don’t retain much memory of it beyond the general hyperactivity (which I guess is the point) and the relentless blue-gray-black colors, which I found terribly depressing. What I’d have given for a minutes of natural light.

    I know that some people make the case that Anderson is one of the best of the movies-as-videogame filmmakers. I wouldn’t know — don’t play videogames, don’t like their impact (generally) on movies. I guess he’s proficient, reasonably talented and energetic … but beyond that I really have no idea. Does he strike you very gifted? Significant? Howso?


  2. Fabrizio del Wrongo says:

    Well, I don’t think the movie is very successful outside of the big racing sequences. I do think Anderson is pretty talented — at least in some ways. He’s got a good feel for composition and for intricate, expansive visuals. This mostly comes through in the “Resident Evil” movies, which include some of the cleverer (and possibly more beautiful) action bits in recent memory. But I’ve never been completely sold on any of his movies. I always stop caring about the plots after about half an hour.


  3. I’m disappointed they ducked Roger Corman’s gonzo tone from the original. That 1970s classic way, WAY better than it deserves to be. It’s funny, thought-provoking, loud, splashy and weird.


    • Fabrizio del Wrongo says:

      The original is a lot of cartoonish-but-edgy fun, isn’t it? Only in the ’70s…

      Have you ever seen “Hollywood Boulevard”? Some of the cars from “Death Race 2000” were used in it. Fun movie.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s