Paleo Retiree writes:


I somehow managed to make it through the 1970s without seeing any of Alejandro Jodorowsky’s movies, the best-known of which were “El Topo,” “The Holy Mountain,” and “Santa Sangre.” A few months ago, though, I watched the documentary “Jodorowsky’s Dune,” about Jodorowsky’s failed attempt to bring Frank Herbert’s sci-fi novel to the screen, and I enjoyed it a lot. In his 80s now, Jodorowsky is a lot of fun to spend time with. He’s still brimful of director / therapist / visionary charisma, and the film is worth seeing just to experience his low-key, sly, and companionable brand of personal magnetism. Hey, charisma is a real thing. I don’t know how you measure it or investigate it, but once you’ve you’ve had some real charisma focused on you a few times its factual existence becomes hard to deny.

Jodorowsky’s a great character. But he’s also rueful and funny about the titanic amount of work he put into this project that came to nothing. Among other things: he lined up Orson Welles, Mick Jagger, Gloria Swanson and David Carradine to act in the movie. That can’t have been easy. Though the results might have been awful — I’m not sure I’d ever really have wanted to sit through a 14 hour long sci-fi movie — they’d certainly have been nutty and memorable. Alas, the financing failed to materialize, “Star Wars” transformed moviemaking and moviegoing, and the novel was eventually taken from Jodorowsky by Dino De Laurentiis, who hired David Lynch to turn it into a film. After his disappointment with “Dune,” Jodorowsky made a few more movies but turned most of his energies to developing a philosophical / psychological system, and to writing graphic novels.

The doc left me wanting to fill in some of those ’70s movie-viewing blanks. So the other night the Question Lady and I caught up with “The Holy Mountain,” Jodorowsky’s spiritual-quest fable from 1973. Quick verdict: If it had been 70 minutes long I’d have enjoyed it almost as much as I usually enjoy Sergei Paradjanov’s movies. But it goes on for two hours and becomes tedious. That said, we both found it a largely engaging bath in trippy, shamanistic, avant-garde theater from that era — very Grotowski, very Peter Brook, very Andrei Serban. It’s an impressive production, with lots of often stunning, elaborately staged tableaus and sequences, and a wealth of gorgeous zooms and tracking shots. (Some legendary shock effects too.) There’s an arc of a sort, but the film is largely non-narrative; it’s made up of ideas, parables and metaphors, fused together with structural notions derived mostly from (as far as I could tell) Jung, Zen and Tarot. Jodorowsky himself plays the wise psychotherapist / spiritual master who guides a group of nine sinners to spiritual awareness. You can’t say he was lacking in chutzpah.


The main question the movie left me with was: What on earth possessed so many artists of that era to want to go beyond art and entertainment, to want to be gurus and masters, and to want to transform their performers and audiences? (For “The Holy Mountain,” Jodorowsky and his disciples — er, his cast — experimented with drugs, lived together communally, and submitted themselves to coaching by a couple of gurus.) Was it just something in the air? Was it finally down to the drugs? And what on earth were these artists imagining that we — once we had managed to transcend space, time, ego, art, etc — would finally arrive at? (Another difference between Paradjanov’s films and Jodorowsky’s: as trippy and avant-garde as they are, Paradjanov’s movies are intended as poetic evocations, not as spiritual quests for the cast and audience.)

I sampled about 30 minutes of Jodorowsky’s commentary track on the disc and enjoyed it thoroughly. Looking back at his huge, ambitious movie, he’s able to recall what was on his mind at the time, as well as what the craziness that’s onscreen was meant to convey. But, as in the documentary, it’s his tone that bewitches. He’s respectful of his old movie and his former self, but he chuckles and smiles about them too. It’s as though he’s talking about a pretentious, ambitious, determined friend — a bit of a maniac — he was close to many decades ago, and who he recalls fondly to this day.


  • I wrote about “Lost in La Mancha,” a good British doc about Terry Gilliam’s so-far-unsuccessful attempts to make a movie about Don Quixote.
  • Paradjanov’s “The Color of Pomegranates” (also known as “Sayat Nova”) is one of my all-time favorite movies, and I like many of his other movies almost as much. To my mind, they really are transformative. This collection of Paradjanov’s movies is a major bargain.

About Paleo Retiree

Onetime media flunky and movie buff and very glad to have left that mess behind. Formerly Michael Blowhard of the cultureblog Now a rootless parasite and bon vivant on a quest to find the perfectly-crafted artisanal cocktail.
This entry was posted in Movies and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Jodorowsky

  1. William Robertson says:

    Thanks for mentioning Paradjanov. I’m off and running on that.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Fake Herzog says:

    You really need to see Santa Sangre next. I saw it in one of Chicago’s great art house theaters back in the day (still running: and it blew me away. Unlike “The Holy Mountain”, which I too thought was way too long and really only interesting for the visuals (and for the nudity — what is it about 70s nudity — I just love boobs, butts, and bush from the 70s!), Santa Sangre has an actual plot that you can follow (it only gets trippy and crazed near the end). Again, stunning visuals and this time some disturbing material.

    I’d love a PR review. I have this one on Laserdisc also in case you want to own it — I need to get rid of my Laserdisc collection somehow!!

    Liked by 1 person

  3. agnostic says:

    Normally I’m not above writing a mini-post in the comments, but this one got long (although not long-winded for a change). My take on increasing degrees of unfamiliarty in fantasy, surrealism, and psychedelia:

    Liked by 3 people

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s