Yes, But Will It Make Me Inspect My Vomit For the Meaning of Life?

Blowhard, Esq. writes:

Sheila_Callaghan_in_2007

From the introduction to an interview with a Brooklyn playwright:

This is what sets her apart from the great percentage of the theater’s current pack of trust-fund scribes and fake-hot-button playwrights — Callaghan speaks straight to the core of one’s being, skewering the comfortable conventions that have turned so much theater into a place where wealthy people digest their dinner. Callaghan wants to make you throw up, then search for the answers of your life in your own vomit.

The whole thing reads like a parody:

Tommy Smith (Rail): Why write a play?

Sheila Callaghan: Because it’s a terrible fucking idea and impossible to get right.

Rail: No, really.

Callaghan: I’m serious. I like to fail at impossible tasks. It’s like I’m striving for something superhuman, which feels kind of noble.

Rail: What does it say about your narrative trajectory that your new play begins with enthusiastic salad-eating and ends with a bittersweet cake feast?

Callaghan: I kind of feel like the answer here lies in the question.

Rail: “When I’m not writing plays, I’m….”

Callaghan: Feeding my gentle, curious, easily distracted son. Teaching Spin and yoga. Trying to sleep. Thinking about fucking. Trying not to think about fucking. Imbibing green drinks and cold coffee. Looking at my stomach in the mirror. Buying anti-aging serums from Sephora. Checking my email. Texting dangerously in my car. Training to become a mogul. Finding coping strategies for my diseased brain. Wondering if PTSD has a sell-by date.

I have to think half the fun of being a New York artist is carrying on like this in interviews.

Related

About Blowhard, Esq.

Amateur, dilettante, wannabe.
This entry was posted in Art and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Yes, But Will It Make Me Inspect My Vomit For the Meaning of Life?

  1. A commenter who prefers to remain anonymous writes:

    I had a coffee date with this woman 10+ years ago. (I too, for my sins, am a theater person.)

    She does have a gift for language. Unfortunately that’s her only gift. Her work is postmodern, meaning that it doesn’t even try to make sense. It has no structure. She couldn’t think her way out of a paper bag if it were wet to the point of falling apart. And yet she is utterly, gloatingly, overweeningly full of herself in the way that one can find only among darlings of the critical establishment.

    In sum, she’s a terrible writer. She should be ignored.

    Like

  2. JV says:

    Jeez, she’s cute.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s