Music for a Political Blizzard

Fenster writes:

WUR, the songs you like to hear.

If you want real good plain old fashioned blizzard music, Blowhard Esq. is spinning a nice track on his show.  Baby, it’s cold outside.  Here, it’s Politics Saturday and this goes out to my son, a Sanders supporter.

I like the new Bernie ad a lot.

As an ad, I mean.  For me at least it is effective. But like the author of the article linked to above I am an aging Boomer sap and so the use of Simon and Garfunkel’s America was inspired.  But it is also telling in interesting ways.

I was about your age–a few years younger, a freshman–when that song came out on the album Bookends.  It was one of those generational anthems.  But an unusual one.  A lot of generational anthems were heroic–the valiant Woodstockers/radicals would triumph over the aging WW2 generation, or were bravely fighting its many oppressions, or were a transcendent mutation arrived to bring a new consciousness.

Take CSNY’s Ohio.

Tin soldiers and Nixon coming,
We’re finally on our own.

Or Steppenwolf’s Monster.

There’s a monster on the loose
It’s got our heads into the noose
And it just sits there watching

America where are you now?
Don’t you care about your sons and daughters?
Don’t you know we need you now
We can’t fight alone against the monster

Or The Fifth Dimension’s The Age of Aquarius

This is the dawning of the Age of Aquarius
The Age of Aquarius
Aquarius! Aquarius!

Harmony and understanding
Sympathy and trust abounding
No more falsehoods or derisions
Golden living dreams of visions
Mystic crystal revelation
And the mind’s true liberation

The America in these songs is a complicated proposition.  Sometimes it is the older generation itself that is the problem.  The Age of Aquarius would sweep all those old-fashioned things out of the way.  Sometimes the idea of America was still strong but had become corrupted by tin soldiers or the war machine.  Seldom was it the case that America was taken straight up, and engaged with on its own terms.

The Simon and Garfunkel song did that (*or maybe not–see post-postscript below).  And so it is appropriate in a way that, say, Joni Mitchell’s Woodstock could not be, with all of its going on about children of god walking down the road, all stardust and golden.  America is not out to change America.

But what’s also interesting about Simon and Garfunkel’s America is how unheroic it is.  Alienated, even.  Not that it was out of place in its time.  The adolescent lovers running off on a bus with no idea where to go or why they are going is redolent of nothing more than the last scene of The Graduate, which was released around the same timeAnd there’s a connection there, too: Mike Nichols used the Bookends song Mrs. Robinson in the soundtrack to the film.

The lovers in America find themselves hurtling down the New Jersey Turnpike in search of an America they have no real idea of.  And the narrator is, as he sings, “empty and aching and I don’t know why.”

Let us be lovers,
We’ll marry our fortunes together.
I’ve got some real estate
Here in my bag.

So we bought a pack of cigarettes,
And Mrs. Wagner’s pies,
And walked off
To look for America.
“Kathy”, I said,
As we boarded a Greyhound in Pittsburgh,
Michigan seems like a dream to me now.

It took me four days
To hitch-hike from Saginaw.
“I’ve come to look for America.”

Laughing on the bus,
Playing games with the faces,
She said the man in the gabardine suit
Was a spy.

I said, “Be careful,
His bowtie is really a camera.”
“Toss me a cigarette,
I think there’s one in my raincoat.”
We smoked the last one
An hour ago.

So I looked at the scenery,
She read her magazine;
And the moon rose over an open field.
“Kathy, I’m lost”, I said,
Though I know she was sleeping.
“I’m empty and aching and
I don’t know why.”

Counting the cars
On the New Jersey Turnpike
They’ve all come
To look for America,
All come to look for America,
All come to look for America.

So now, this parable of alienation has been transformed by politics into one of patriotic inspiration.  Of course, some cutting was required and not only for the sake of brevity.  The Sanders ad includes the lines about counting the cars on the New Jersey Turnpike but it does not include the “empty and aching” line.  Moreover, the suggestion in the lyrics is that all of those cars on the Turnpike are probably filled with other empty and aching individuals “all come to look for America”.

That’ll get you into a ballot box right quick!

But just as you don’t gauge a political debate by who won in debate terms but in political terms, you don’t gauge a political ad by whether is holds up under snide critical scrutiny but whether it works.  For me, the ad works, and no doubt this is both because of and in spite of its double-sided quality.

Whether it works for all, or most, or the right people politically, is being decided as we speak.  It’s mud wrestling now, with progressives making the charge against their tribune that the ad is too white, with Hillary’s surrogates jumping in to inflame, with Sanders arguing back that Hillary should be ashamed of such tactics, with the right lampooning the ad, and so forth.

What can I say?  This is just the best political season ever.


Hell, if you’ve gotten this far let me recommend you go to the comments section to check out two shrewdly observed comments by agnostic.  In one he takes up the issue of how most of the ostensible action stirred up by the boomers was mostly the work of the so called Silent Generation before them, with the boomers characteristically taking the limelight and the Silents shunning it.  In the other he takes up the important issue of Trump-Sanders convergence.  His conclusion:

Trump will make the Bernie ad real.

Interesting speculation.

No doubt Sanders is playing on the homeland themes that Reagan and others, typically Republican, have mined so successfully over the years.  But where else might we have seen that kind of energy this election year.  Could it be . . . Trump?

The Trumpian right wing sites are all lit up today over the bad National Review taking up an entire issue to bash Trump as a fake conservative.  And that he is.  Not for nothing the party leaders are warming to him more rapidly than Cruz.  He’d do a better job hanging on to the Reagan Democrats.  Here’s an angry mom straight out of the Bernie ad, ripped at the GOP for condescending to regular people.

These people are in play.  agnostic says Trump will lead them and not Bernie.  I suspect that is right, net net.  But Sanders’ video was intentional, as most things are in the scripted and spun worlds of drama and politics, and I think it is aimed at middle America by way of progressives, the way Trump is aiming at middle America by way of the Right.

Another thing is worth noting about the Sanders video.  Sanders’ side can express outrage today that Hillary’s surrogates would attack it for being too white.  But surely they saw the whiteness of the ad, in both skin coloration and ideation, when they decided to run it.  Why would they have done so, knowing full well that they would be attacked from the identity politics side, and that even the Washington Post argues that black votes are Hillary’s firewall?

Maybe it is bad politics.  Maybe Sanders and his followers are just so much who they are they they are incapable of being someone else.  But it is also possibly the case that Bernie is sending a general election message out here: I do not buy the identity politics stuff that my side has forced on me.  Black votes may be needed for the nomination but identity politics seems like a loser to me in the general.


Sorry.  One last thing about America and America.

I have carried what I think to be the standard interpretation of that song around with me for almost 50 years–two drifters off to see the world, with no destination and no plan to get there.

But maybe not the more I think of it.  Consider the narrator starting out in Michigan, catching a bus in Pittsburgh and then counting the cars on the New Jersey Turnpike.  He starts going south, since heading south rather than north is the standard escape route for all wanderers on the run (“we can make the Mexican border . . . “).

But he catches a bus in Pittsburgh and ends up in New Jersey.  Why would he go east from Pittsburgh to New Jersey if his destination were further south?  He’s probably headed to New York City, Paul Simon’s home.  That’s where the song is pointing; that’s where he’ll golightly to find his new home.

Looked at this way, America is the sung version of that Saul Steinberg New Yorker cover.  There’s nothing happening out there in the wasteland.  To find yourself, and to escape that empty and aching feeling, you have to come to the Big Apple.  So much for America.


About Fenster

Gainfully employed for thirty years, including as one of those high paid college administrators faculty complain about. Earned Ph.D. late in life and converted to the faculty side. Those damn administrators are ruining everything.
This entry was posted in Music, Politics and Economics and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to Music for a Political Blizzard

  1. agnostic says:

    The Simon and Garfunkel song is also different for the sense of place it evokes — not the Space Age-y sunshine of the swingin’ West Coast, but the unglamorous Rust Belt, whose fortunes and populations were just beginning to peak / decline by the late ’60s. Hitchhiking in Saginaw, Michigan or hopping on a Greyhound bus in Pittsburgh (the capital of Appalachia) — doesn’t get any more blue-collar and unpretentious than that.

    The Bernie crowd feel nostalgia for that kind of world, but they’re only interested — for now — in cosplaying as the original cast of characters within a meticulously accurate stage setting. Their hearts are somewhat in the right place for wanting the good old days to come back, but they’re also somewhat decadent for only wanting to indulge in an emotionally soothing game of dress-up and make-believe in their fairytale small-town fantasy land / theme park.

    Trump is the one who’s going to bring all those off-shored jobs and industries back to Michigan and Western PA (and upstate New York, and small-town New England). Without that, there will be no organic recovery of the folks and the folkways of the region.

    Just watch: citizens of Rust Belt counties are going to turn out to give Trump the greatest support that there’s ever been for non-incumbent Republican presidential candidate.

    Trump will make the Bernie ad real.


    • JV says:

      “Trump will make the Bernie ad real.”

      How so? By “kicking China’s butt?” By somehow forcing Apple to manufacture in the US? I know he just says whatever the hell comes into his head, but statements like that are oblivious to how government does or doesn’t work. I’m a Bernie supporter but I’m fully aware there’s no way in hell he’ll get most of his platform enacted either. And at the end of the day, do you want to side with a guy who peddles almost nothing but fear? The narrative thrust of the US has been ever greater inclusion, to the betterment of almost every aspect of life. Yesterday’s Wallace is today’s Trump. The specifics are different but the motivations are the same.


  2. agnostic says:

    Sidenote: as usual the Silent Generation gets eclipsed by the WWII Gen and the Boomers, even when they are the majority of people discussed in the context of generational change.

    Simon and Garfunkel, Crosby Stills Nash and Young, everyone in Fifth Dimension, about half of Steppenwolf, and of course Bern-arino himself — all born no later than 1945 (and no earlier than the ’30s).

    The counter-culture of the late ’60s and early ’70s was nearly 100% a product of the Silent Generation — not just people older-than-Boomers, but also not the WWII Gen either.

    I don’t just mean the pop culture, but the broader Movement — Civil Rights, second-wave feminism, hippies, New Agers, etc. The famous ones we can just check for their birth year. But do people really think none of them were 25 or older? In 1970, a 25 year-old was born in 1945, at the end of the Silent Gen.

    Some of the earliest Boomers were spectators, groupies, and occasional foot soldiers, but c’mon — 19 year-old college students re-shaping society? Typical self-aggrandizement from the Boomers — and typical lack of assertion from the Silents.


  3. agnostic says:

    You guys did change the world, it was just somewhat later during the hedonistic heyday of disco, new wave, and yuppies.

    (Speaking as a fan of disco and new wave, thought not so much of yuppies.)


  4. Jeffrey S. says:


    This comment made me laugh from agnostic:

    “Trump is the one who’s going to bring all those off-shored jobs and industries back to Michigan and Western PA (and upstate New York, and small-town New England). Without that, there will be no organic recovery of the folks and the folkways of the region.”

    If Trump were to become President (I’m one of those National Review types who shudder at the thought) I’d put money that Trump will do zero to bring back any of those “off-shored jobs and industries.” I do think that if he keeps his promises with regard to immigration (a big if — who knows just what Trump really believes in and what he’ll deal away once in power) that a more restrictive immigration policy would help the heartland (in all sorts of ways, especially with respect to wage pressure.) But agnostic knows about as much about the economy as he claims to know about the Middle-East — which is very little.

    The difference here is that he can’t ban me like the little cry-baby did back on his own blog 😉


    • Fenster says:

      All are welcome here.

      So far.

      The coffee house ethos is supreme but as Europe is finding out tolerance has limits.


    • agnostic says:

      More brilliant prognostications from the mind of Jewish neo-cons — imagine bragging about being a National Review type, when it has descended so pathetically into cosplay conservatism by this point.

      Gay marriage? All aboard!

      Populist economics? NOW JUST HOLD ON THERE A MOMENT

      It’s understandable, though, he feels a sinking sensation whenever the goyim assert their own interests — they’re always one step away from torch-and-pitchfork pogroms, isn’t that right?


      • Jeffrey S. says:


        If you consider opposing Trump “cosplay conservatism” then I suggest you don’t know the first thing about conservative thought, neo- or otherwise. Incidentally, there was one goofy writer at NRO who wrote (a terrible) piece in favor of so-called gay “marriage” (scare quotes are always used by me.) It was bad judgment on their behalf to run the piece, but it hardly represented a magazine-wide endorsement of the whole farcical concept.

        As for the broader point about the goyim — I keep telling agnostic, I’m half-goy myself (on my mother’s side, so the Jews don’t even want me!) I think that the concerns of the residents of “Fishtown”, as discussed intelligently for example in this little “Corner” post are worthy of attention and creative solutions:

        I just don’t think “populist economics”, at least as articulated by Trump, will do much to help those voters (again, with the exception of immigration restrictions — restrictions many on the staff of National Review support — let’s not forget that Mark Krikorian writes for them.)

        Of course, you might have learned all of this if you bothered to start reading outside of your bizarre alt-right bubble or even engaged me in argument instead of banning me like a crying baby.

        That’s O.K., I’m always welcome at this civilized forum 🙂


  5. Fenster says:

    Indeed all are welcome at this civil forum as long as things remain civil. Otherwise, take it outside.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s