Update! Virgin Births Reason Serpents Not As Smart As Us?

Glynn Marshes writes:

This just in. Sex makes you smarter.

Posted in Science, Sex | Tagged , , | 5 Comments

Quantitative Easing III Happened Because of a Single Blogger

Sir Barken Hyena writes:

So claims Tyler Cowen, and the blogger is Scott Sumner of The Money Illusion. I tried to read his blog for years and finally gave up, so I’m in no position to evaluate this. But if so, it’s an incredible moment, whatever you think of the Fed and QEIII. A single little known blogger turned monetary policy around from the force of his arguments, presented only on a blog. That’s quite something I’d say.

Posted in Politics and Economics | Tagged , , , , | 5 Comments

Serpents and Virgin Birth, oh my

Glynn Marshes writes:

Once thought to be an anomaly and confined to captive animals, scientists now suspect that parthenogenesis occurs somewhat regularly among wild snakes.

This BBC article doesn’t note the theological irony however. It also doesn’t include any comments from Greg “Men, Who Needs Them” Hampikian.

Posted in Philosophy and Religion, Science | Tagged , , | 6 Comments

Question Lady Question

The Question Lady writes:

Do you prefer being around people your own age, or do you enjoy having friends who are of different ages than you are?

Posted in Uncategorized | 7 Comments

Sailer on Broyard and “Passing”

Paleo Retiree writes:

Anatole Broyard, 1920-1990

Steve Sailer has been writing (and leading discussions) about the topic of “passing” — the way some black people “pass” as white.  (See here, here, here and here.) One of his examples has been the late writer Anatole Broyard, who was best-known as a book reviewer for The New York Times, and whose blackness wasn’t publicly acknowledged until after his death. I had this little bit to add to the yakfest:

Many, many years ago, while Broyard was still in his prime, a book critic I knew told me that Broyard was black/Creole; another friend, who’d hung around the NYC lit-intellectual world in the ’50s and ’60s, confirmed it to me; and the black intellectual Albert Murray told me about it too. Murray told the tale with great amusement: he thought Broyard’s adventures were pretty funny.

Albert Murray is great, btw: shrewd and smart about race and racial differences, yet in a very appreciative way; and wise about many things, including writing, books, jazz, art, and life more generally. I only met Mr. Murray (and one does refer to him as Mr. Murray) three times, but I’ve read much of what he’s published, and he’s a thinker who’s had a big impact on me. I’d be very eager to read/hear Steve Sailer’s reactions to him.

In any case … Despite the big fuss at the time the info about Broyard’s blackness went public, I suspect that it had been an open secret in some fancy NYC circles for decades. I mean, even I knew about it. (Never met Broyard myself.)

All of my sources told me that there were two reasons Broyard didn’t want to identify as black: 1) he didn’t want the racial thing to be a big issue in his life (it wasn’t a topic that interested him much), and 2) as a Creole, he genuinely didn’t think of himself as black. (My acquaintances all told me that Broyard was a successful ladies’ man too.) Needless to say, once Broyard died and the fact that he’d been black became more widely known, most commentators turned the discussion into one “about race” — something that struck me as wildly unfair given that Broyard wanted his life and his work to be about different subjects entirely.

America’s one-drop rule — whereby anyone with even a bit of African blood in him/her gets classified as “black” — is nuts, right? As is our tendency to boil 90% of all serious political discussions down into one “about race.” (The same one, over and over and over …) Not that race and racial things aren’t enormously fascinating — but, good lord, could the shape most discussions about the topics take be more predictable and boring? If I never hear the word “identity” again I’ll die a much happier man.

  • Here’s Wikipedia’s entry on Broyard.
  • I love Broyard’s slim books: a memoir about life as a Greenwich Village bohemian, and a collection of reflections and musings noted down as he was dying of prostate cancer. He was one brainy and elegant writer.
  • I wrote a little something about my own battle with prostate cancer.
  • Broyard’s daughter Bliss, who was raised as an upper-middle-class white girl in Connecticut, has published a book about discovering that her dad was part black. Perhaps inevitably, PBS got fascinated by Bliss’ story.
  • Here’s some fun I once had at the expense of PBS’s dragginess and earnestness.

Because we here at Uncouth Reflections are seriously irked by book publishers’ idiotic current pricing policies, let me express my annoyance with the fact that, in the case of both of Broyard’s books and his daughter’s book, the Kindle versions are currently more expensive than the paperback editions. Proof:

There are times when I wonder if the New York City trade publishing wants to die …

Posted in Books Publishing and Writing, Science | Tagged , , , , | 8 Comments

Golf Wildlife

Paleo Retiree writes:

Quite amazing what a $200 pocketcam is capable of these days …

Posted in Animals, Photography | Tagged , | 6 Comments

New Urban Old Town

Fenster writes:

Sounds like Celebration, Florida, the Disney-inspired small town, is not immune from the problems of the real world: a murder at the end of 2010, followed shortly thereafter by a suicide.  And now this article about murder’s dark backstory.

Makes one wonder about the possibility of manufacturing innocence.  I know that’s not the goal of new urbanism, but it did seem to be the goal of this Disney iteration.

If you have a choice where you want to live, and you want to live under new urbanist principles, there’s always the prospect of existing places!

One of my favorites, and a place I called home for almost five years: lovely Hopewell, New Jersey.  Compact, walkable, self-contained, surrounded by open land (a lot of it recently conserved), filled with older homes with charm and character, and nice people, too.

Posted in Architecture, Photography | 6 Comments

Dan Ariely

Fenster writes:

Do you know the behavioral economist Dan Ariely?

His work is worth knowing, and he is accessible to boot, the very model of the engaged scholar of the internet era: interested in both relevant research and the clear communication of results to a wide audience in an enjoyable manner.

His TED talks here, here, and here are interesting and highly entertaining.  Ditto his book Predictably Irrational.

He has a blog, too, in which he does some semi-public ruminating about his research ideas.  Here’s today’s post, in which he pulls a possible research idea from literature:

Not only do I find examples of behavioral economics in literature, sometimes I get research ideas from it. This passage from Wallace Stegner’s Angle of Repose was one such instance:

“Touch. It is touch that is the deadliest enemy of chastity, loyalty, monogamy, gentility with its codes and conventions and restraints. By touch we are betrayed and betray others… an accidental brushing of shoulders or touching of hands… hands laid on shoulders in a gesture of comfort that lies like a thief, that takes, not gives, that wants, not offers, that awakes, not pacifies. When one flesh is waiting, there is electricity in the merest contact.”

We already know that touch can change our behavior, for  instance, holding something for a few seconds makes us much more likely to buy it. But what about how touch, as slight as described here, changes interpersonal dynamics? How exactly might I test this idea? What might an experiment look like? And could I possibly get approval for it from the Institutional Review Board? More on this soon, I hope…

I subscribe to his blog and am interested to see if and how he formulates a research design for this, and how he gets it by an Institutional Review Board, which can be a persnickety creature.

Posted in Politics and Economics | 3 Comments

“The Tree, the Mayor and the Mediatheque”

 
 
 

Fabrizio del Wrongo writes:

When you think of New Wave filmmakers who’ve delved into politics Eric Rohmer probably isn’t the first guy to spring to mind. And for good reason: he was always the group’s miniaturist-philosopher, a guy who was more interested in plumbing the potentialities of a young girl’s knee than in scrutinizing the big isms and schisms of his day. Maybe that’s why his 1993 “The Tree, the Mayor and the Mediatheque” feels less like a political film than a conversation about politics — like the meandering sort of chitchat you might engage in on your Facebook wall. In fact — and this is typical for Rohmer — the movie is structured as a series of dialogs, each a low-key face-off between contrasting points of view: urban vs. rural, action vs. reaction, male vs. female, adult vs. child, and so on. Rohmer uses these oppositions to scrutinize the ways in which our viewpoints intersect, overlap, and butt up against each other, and he comes up with a pretty interesting movie in the process.

Continue reading →

Posted in Architecture, Movies, Performers, Politics and Economics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 8 Comments

Question Lady Question

The Question Lady writes:

How much of a neatnik or order freak are you?

Posted in Personal reflections | 4 Comments