Europe Seems to Have a Thing Right Now for Twin, White, Abstract Towers

Blowhard, Esq. writes:

Here are the “Torres de Hercules” in Spain, designed by Rafael de La-Hoz Architects.

Pretty terrible, but nothing compared to the Bella Sky Hotel in Denmark, designed by a Danish firm called 3xn. This website calls it “a tasteful and warm Scandinavian home.”

I defy anyone to point to a single feature that’s “warm.” Or “tasteful.” It’s a German expressionist-by-way-of-Scandinavia nightmare.

What are the worst eyesores you’ve seen lately?

Unknown's avatar

About Blowhard, Esq.

Amateur, dilettante, wannabe.
This entry was posted in Architecture and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Europe Seems to Have a Thing Right Now for Twin, White, Abstract Towers

  1. I like the Spanish one. Reminds me of mid-century concert block walls, which I love. http://tinyurl.com/8eyg59g

    Like

  2. Fenster's avatar Fenster says:

    The first one reminds me of another Spanish riff–uncompleted and unlikely to ever be built. It is part of Enrique Norten’s winning entry in the architectural competition to re-do Rutgers main College Ave. campus. Here’s a link to the design below.

    There’s only one tower, but it also looks like, for want of a better term, and with a tip o’ th’ hat to Blowhard Esq. and his pal Venturi, a decorated silo.

    http://www.google.com/imgres?hl=en&safe=off&sa=X&rlz=1C1SAVC_enUS502US502&biw=1366&bih=600&tbm=isch&prmd=imvnso&tbnid=ZMa-BKSgw-G8gM:&imgrefurl=http://www.bustler.net/index.php/event/enrique_norten_retrospective_at_marco_museo_de_arte_contemporaneo_de_monter/&docid=CHVuCPv5n2YD4M&imgurl=http://www.bustler.net/images/uploads/enrique_norten_03.jpg&w=480&h=480&ei=N6BxUOLbHvPW0gHN84CICw&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=222&vpy=132&dur=159&hovh=225&hovw=225&tx=156&ty=125&sig=114318689108687834101&page=1&tbnh=131&tbnw=130&start=0&ndsp=22&ved=1t:429,r:1,s:0,i:77

    Like

  3. Gah. Amusing, or at least kookily provocative, as “design” — I can see getting a kick out of such forms if they were wastebaskets, vases or pen-and-pencil holders. But they’re selfevidently disasters as urbanistic gestures. Look at the bases — how do they interact with the space there, and with the sidewalk? Answer: they carve out and leave a lot of dead space. How do they interact with their neighbors? Answer: not at all. They’re basically showoffy, freestanding structures. The world doesn’t need any more of those.

    How a building looks is pretty important, but how it behaves — what kind of neighbor is it? how does it treat passersby? etc — is FAR more important, IMHO.

    Like

  4. Callowman's avatar Callowman says:

    Check out the Peter B. Lewis Building at Case Western in Cleveland. Looks like a spacecraft accident.

    Like

Leave a reply to Paleo Retiree Cancel reply