Linkage

Blowhard, Esq. writes:

About Blowhard, Esq.

Amateur, dilettante, wannabe.
This entry was posted in Linkathons. Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Linkage

  1. Will S. says:

    Having read the link just before, I was expecting something else before I clicked on the Postrel story. 😉

    Instead, yet another wonder of 3D printing! People keep finding interesting new things to do with it!

    And, as it happens, it still does tie in, somewhat, with the sexual theme of the previous link, in terms of who did spinning. 😉

    Like

  2. H.D. Miller says:

    Thank you for the shout out. You all have been very kind to the Manolo over the years, and vastly entertaining to me. Thank you!

    Liked by 3 people

  3. Mupetblast says:

    From the erosion of free speech to an increasing interest in the evils of Israel, I sense the zeitgeist definitely moving closer to Europe.

    Like

  4. Mupetblast says:

    What’s fascinating about the speech issue on campuses is that the left no longer denies any of it. There are now too many stories of speech suppression to claim it’s all conservative cherry-picking. And the theories underlying this phenomenon, from hate speech to “safe spaces,” are undeniably concepts dreamed up progressives; progressives IN the academy no less (as opposed to a union group, e.g.).

    They’ve moved to acknowledging this and defending it, because “conservatives control every other institution.”

    Liked by 2 people

  5. agnostic says:

    The next radical social-political experiment won’t have to do with marriage — that’s falling for the con that the gay marriage issue is about marriage first, and secondarily about whom it’s letting into the institution.

    Clueless conservatives, or rather befuddled reactionaries, respond with, “Well, if you’re going to let ridiculous group X get married, why not ridiculous group Y? And ridiculous group Z? Where will the desecration of marriage end?”

    But the culture war is not about marriage — it’s about giving fags all sorts of privileges that they don’t deserve, ignoring and indeed obscuring and denying the fact that they are fundamentally abnormal rather than normal.

    That’s what makes the idea of them being married and committed such a joke, or the idea that two giddy Peter Pan homos are just as maternal and nurturing toward children as a mature woman. Or that what makes them *them* is no less healthy and wholesome than what makes heteros *hetero* — just don’t ask about how many diseases are devouring their beleaguered half-corpses.

    Therefore the next big crusade in the culture war will be about “what other way can we propagandize homosexuality as ‘just like us’ and give them goodies accordingly?” Not “what other risible group should we allow to get married?”

    Look at blacks in the Civil Rights era — it didn’t move to “what other group should we allow to enter our wholesome white schools?” They could’ve cared less about Mexicans, Orientals, American Indians, etc. Rather, it moved to “what other privileges, set-asides, and quotas can we shower on the blacks?”

    The culture war is based around sacralizing a victim group (blacks, fags), not desecrating a particular institution (a side effect, not a sustained target).

    Like

  6. Marc Pisco says:

    “We all know that a party, a palace, a great undertaking, a lunch for writers and journalists, an atmosphere of cordial and spontaneous camaraderie, are essentially horrendous.”

    Sometimes you get the feeling that Metaphysical-Mode Borges is a simulacrum of Borges, a labyrinth without a center.

    Either that, or he could rattle off a page of ominous, iterative, comma-spliced, and vaguely geometrical Borgesismso in between naps. If there’s a difference.

    Liked by 1 person

  7. Thanks for the shout out! I do indeed need funds to keep me, uh, “wet”, but those willing to contribute must understand that it will just lead to more music making. And nobody wants that.

    Liked by 1 person

  8. JV says:

    Borges on Citizen Kane: “It is not intelligent, though it is the work of genius—in the most nocturnal and Germanic sense of that bad word.”

    That kind of critique is just a runaround so that one can criticize something that’s obviously great. To such a critic, the thing must be contained. It’s inherent greatness is an affront to such a person’s weak grasp on the world.

    And I love Borges’ writing! Just, you know, geez. And Sarte in that same article comes off as a fucking idiot.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s