Eddie Pensier writes:
Mama Pensier, c. 1965
Paleo Retiree writes:
I don’t have much feeling for, let alone interest in, current movies, and recently I’ve been seeing no more than two or three new movies each year. So you’d be nuts to take my reactions to current movies any more seriously than you’d take my opinions about current pop music — where popular culture goes, I’m one seriously out-of-it old duffer. All that said …
This movie struck me as adequately absorbing in the current Paris-set, school-of-Luc-Besson, thriller-for-adults mode. I’ll try to keep my description of the plot setup vague and basic. Costner’s an aging but notoriously effective killer for the CIA who gets a freelance assignment that offers him some potentially serious benefits; meanwhile, after years of devoting himself to his job, he sets about trying to reconcile with his smart and busy ex-wife (Connie Nielsen) and especially with his moody teenage daughter (Hailee Steinfeld), whom he hasn’t been in touch with for ‘way too long.
The school-of-Besson style (full of hustle, tautness, cobblestones and bald-headed tough guys) has become such a brand that it’s hard not to catch yourself wondering when Jason Statham and Liam Neeson are going to show up. But, despite the familiarity, the film seemed to me decent enough for what it is. In the film’s favor: the action, design and photography are chilly, dark and stylish, and the film isn’t marred by excessive shakeycam. Costner may be a lot more gravel-voiced and weatherbeaten than he was the last time I saw him, but the wife assures me that he’s still sexy. And I like what I imagine Costner stands up for as a performer. I may be imagining things, but Costner seems to me to want, in an era of Boomer and post-Boomer irreverence and undercutting, to embody a positive masculine ideal — sensitive, yes, and proficient with a quip, but also macho (in a non cartoonish way) and Waspy-heroic: a rueful Gary Cooper for a world that no longer respects Cooper-esque virtues. Amber Heard, as the dynamo careerist/dominatrix who, completely implausibly, gives Costner his assignment and supervises his progress, is amusing in a wonderfully over-the-top way. She wears her sleek outfits and big wigs con molto brio, and she turns up the heat on poor square Costner, toying with him mercilessly. (She’s so fatale a femme that you wonder why on earth she needs Costner to do all that killing for her.) She reminded me a lot of Sharon Stone in Stone’s just-prior-to-“Basic-Instinct” days: alluring in a super-driven, hard-as-nails kind of way, yet able to summon up a convincing amount of purring softness too, and not yet the camp dragon lady she so quickly turned into after becoming a genuine star. As her opposite number, Connie Nielsen is the fetching, easy-to-relate-to and proficient mature thing she nearly always is. I’ve never understood why Connie Nielsen isn’t a star.
Not in the film’s favor: this is one of the Besson team’s lazier scripts, bizarrely devoid of any decently ingenious plot twists. (And a thriller without a well-turned plot twist or two is a sad thing indeed.) A big surprise is that (spoiler alert) the film’s two main arcs — Costner’s brutal assignment, and his attempt to win over his family — never intersect. In other words — and spoiler alert again — it never once occurs to the bad guys to threaten Costner’s family. WTF?
My biggest problem with the film, though, was that it hangs on one of my least-favorite recent-movie tropes: the neglectful dad who wants to win back his resentful adolescent daughter. Who was it who thought that the audience for a sexy, Paris-set, high-voltage thriller would want to spend half its time watching Costner shuffle, apologise and swallow his pride while the actress playing his daughter sulks and disses him? The writing in these scenes isn’t half bad, the two actors are very skillful, and there’s a pleasing anti-feminist final point to them — the daughter doesn’t get around to respecting her dad until he puts on a suit (ie., until he acts like a grownup). Yay to that. But can we please have a break from guilty dads apologizing to their angry-yet-vulnerable daughters for, say, the next 30 years?
Related
Fenster writes:
A suggestion for Fabrizio’s Man-Movie List: Act of Valor.
That’s the 2012 film that used active duty Navy Seals to portray active duty Navy Seals. It was panned by critics but well-liked by audiences. I liked it.
It took a little getting used to. The Seals are not really actors but soldiers conscripted to the job. There’s some truth to the charge in the USA Today review that “the soldiers’ awkward line readings are glaring enough to distract from the potency of the story.” Roger that.
But there is another side to how the amateurism gets played out. The Seals in the film are modest, dutiful and respectful of both authority and their obligations to others (including wives and kids). Cartoon-style action heroes they ain’t. If anything, they appear to be throwbacks to an earlier era of understatement.
The dialogue doesn’t have the trademarked tough guy banter required of modern action stars. But there is a kind of poetry to it.
Hey, Chief!
We’re not gonna make secondary extract!
– You’re gonna have to figure it out, man!
– Hold on!
Come on. Stay with me.
Stay with me.
Stay with us.
Come on, Mike. Wake up.
Wake up. Come on, man.
– Contact!
– Pick it up, pick it up.
Yo, Chief!
We can make it to rally point!
– Sounds good! Pass it to LT!
– Come on, man.
LT, LT, this is assault team.
We just lost the secondary extract.
I say again, we just lost
secondary extract.
Moving to rally point.
How copy, over?
– We’re about a click out.
– Mikey, wake up.
One click out!
Let’s go, Mike.
Wake up. Come on, buddy.
Come on, Mikey! Wake up!
– Good?
– Backstage clear.
Rocket out!
He’s not breathing!
– Breathe, Mikey!
– We’re up! We’re up!
Chief, let me get your M-4!
Sir, what’s the status
on those boats?
I lost Whiplash on the run.
Told ’em you hit the target early.
They’re coming in hot.
– Roger that.
– Fuck! Take this, man.
Breathe, Mikey. Come on, Mikey.
– I got no pulse.
– Contact rear!
Contact rear!
Holy shit!
Taking rounds in…
Pick it up. Pick it up.
Ajay! QRF coming up the rear!
Whiplash! Whiplash!
Secondary extract is burnt.
Moving to tertiary extract.
I have eight packs,
seven Sierras, one package.
Package
with multiple wounds.
The Sierra has gunshot wound
to the head.
This will be a hot extract.
What the fuck?!
– Oh, shit!
– Mikey, stay down!
– Keep him down, man!
– Where the fuck am I?!
– Calm down, brother.
– Mikey’s up, man. Mikey’s up.
Stay down, brother. Calm.
Be easy. We’re almost out of here.
We’re almost out of here.
Mikey!
– Hang on, buddy.
– Where are we?
– We’re on our way to extract.
– What happened?
You’re good to go.
You took one to the face, man.
You’re a hard motherfucker.
– Did we get her?
– Yes.
– Oh, my God.
– We’re on our way to extract.
Ajay, splash it. Splash it.
Water! Water! Water!
Going in! Going in!
I got her! I got her!
It’s fucking going under.
Out! Get the fuck out!
Fenster writes:
Richard Scarry’s books really were my favorites for reading to the kids. Well, other than Dr. Suess maybe, whose work sort of stands alone.
Scarry did his share of simple cartooning, and his characters and situations were typically memorable. But here and there he would show off an interesting painterly sense of color too. Here are some examples.
Or maybe I am just being sentimental for those days.
Fenster writes:
Maybe you have to be a parent. If you are, you might remember Richard Scarry’s children’s books. They were my favorites for reading to the kids, the exact opposite of the dreaded Scooby Doo series, which I detested.
I remember my favorite time reading to them. It was in airports as we traveled. We would first let them loose to terrorize the poor childless travelers, who would be helpless to do anything for fear of appearing anti-family. After a good couple of chuckles at their expense, we’d settle down and read to the kids to get them to calm down.
Our favorite Scarry character was Lowly Worm. He got pretty famous, appearing not only in books
but also as afuzzy creature
and as a full-size plasticized version kids could ride for half a buck.
We never had the heart to let our kids see Eraserhead, though. That’s where David Lynch has him first get old and fat, then lose his foot in a bicycle accident, and then get real, real sick and die.
Blowhard, Esq. writes:
To quote Paleo Retiree, are American Apparel ads one of the great cultural achievements of our time? Yes or no (and the correct answer is yes), you’ve got to tip your ironically-purchased trucker hat to any campaign that makes clothed (or, ok, semi-clothed) women look more lascivious than fully naked ones. Terry Richardson-esque perviness in full effect. Besides, any fashion campaign that injects some playful naughtiness while upsetting the bluestockings is alright by us.
Who’s the ideal AA model? A few key characteristics would include:
But perhaps the main quality she must have is an ability to attract the attention of CEO Dov Charney, who shoots many of the company’s ads himself. Some people have it all figured out, eh? Given that AA’s ads blur the line between fashion and porn, perhaps it’s not surprising that Sasha Grey has posed for the company and Faye Reagan did some ads for them before making the leap into hardcore.
The content below the jump is NSFW. Hope you’re having a good weekend.
Eddie Pensier writes:
Lobby of the Palmer House Hilton, Chicago.
Related
Glynn Marshes writes:
Let’s be quite clear about this: I do not like my Martini mucked about with; I guess, in exactly the same way that Dad did not want ice or lemon peel in his Gin and French. Traditional and unmoved to the last, I despise change when something — to my eyes, at least — is pretty close to perfection. But there are now some truly vile so-called Martinis being mixed out there by unscrupulous and, frankly, damaged folks (they have been renamed “mixologists”; I ask you, what exactly is wrong with the title “barman” or “bartender”?) who are endlessly thinking up novel (nasty) things to do to this unique drink. And what makes it worse is that there are plenty of cretins out there who quietly sit on bar stools and order them.
And, the recipe 🙂
Have 2 of your favorite Martini glasses ready: 1 in the freezer, 1 to hand. Fill a glass pitcher half-full with fresh ice and pour a good splash of vermouth over it. Stir briefly and strain out all traces of liquid. Fill the Martini glass that’s to hand with gin and pour it over the ice. Stir briskly for 20 seconds and strain into the chilled glass. Usnig a (well-scrubbed) potato peeler, remove a generous piece of zest from an unwaxed lemon and, using your thumb and forefinger, tweak (not twist) it over the surface of the drink. Discard. Remove another piece of zest, repeat, then curl it into a tiny scroll and drop it in. Absolute perfection.
I occasionally favor 3 tiny cocktail onions threaded onto a stick and immersed in the drink too. This is called a Gibson. Traditionally, this does not include lemon zest; but I prefer it with. I guess the terminal purist would now tell me that this was a “mucked about” Gibson. And I guess he would be right.
— Simon Hopkinson, Second Helpings of Roast Chicken