Surf Music

Fabrizio del Wrongo writes:

Related

Posted in Music, Sports | Tagged , , , , , | 3 Comments

Happy Thanksgiving

Blowhard, Esq writes:

wildwestweekly

The UR crew heads off to prepare a feast.

Posted in Personal reflections | Leave a comment

Body Hack: Resistant Starch

Glynn Marshes writes:

Some interesting discussion breaking out within the paleo crowd: is it possible that paleo dieters have overlooked the benefits of a class of carbohydrates called resistant starches?

Richard Nikoley of the blog Free the Animal is leading the way on the pro resistant starch argument. Here’s his primer on the topic.

According to Nikoley, potential benefits of consuming resistant starches — a type of starch that isn’t digested in the small intestine, but instead passes to the large intestine where it is fermented by that organ’s resident microflora — include increased production (in the gut) of shortchain fatty acids. These, in turn, lower intestinal pH, which inhibits the growth of pathogenic bacteria and and increases the absorptive potential of minerals, among other benefits.

Continue reading

Posted in Food and health | 5 Comments

Hashing, Blockchains, Cryptography and Bitcoin

Sir Barken Hyena writes:

What a zippy headline! Rolls off the tongue like honey. But a lot of people will be saying those words in the coming years, as Bitcoin is now poised to launch into the mainstream, to go as they say “to many zeros, or one”.

Many Bitcoin early adopters are web developers. That’s because we understand and trust the technology. For the average slob though, we need a sort of Dummies Guide to the Heart of Bitcoin.

Bitcoin uses cryptography to provide the trust that in today’s financial world comes from third parties. It does this by an ingeniously stacking up a Jenga-like tower of encrypted transactions that comes crashing down with the slightest tampering. You don’t have to be a geek to understand how it does this, no math required. Let’s jump in!

Hashing is a process that makes a unique identifier from anything digital. Feed in a picture of Dali’s anteater, and out comes JFsf3f93k0fkv5HHfmvv. A different picture will give another identifier, say h9YYYedkkw583hfl5qG. Each picture can only ever produce one particular string when hashed. So it’s a digital fingerprint. And you can make a hash from an audio recording, a text document, a CAD design, as long as it’s in digital form.

One use of this is to tell if two documents are the same with out actually having the documents in question, only the hashes of them. If even one comma is different, the hashes won’t match. Bitcoin uses hashing to compare transactions to see if one might be counterfeit. Which brings us to the Blockchain.

Bitcoin is strange, really strange. For one thing, there is no such thing as a bitcoin. There are only transactions recorded in a ledger, with debits and credits to wallets. That’s it!

The unit of account is the satoshi, 100 million satoshis equal one bitcoin. That’s all a “bitcoin” is: a transaction, recorded at a certain wallet, at a certain time, for 100,000,000 satoshis.

But this is no ordinary ledger, in fact it’s a cloud of ledgers. The Bitcoin software runs on something like 40,000 computers. Every ten minutes all the new transactions are sprayed out by the software across the internet to every computer running Bitcoin. This data is examined and synchronized.  Once the collating is done and there is complete agreement across all systems, a new row is made in the global ledger and copied out across the network.

Each of these rows is a called a block, and they stack up over time to form the blockchain.

Now suppose I want to fake an entry, give myself a nice 30,000 BTC out of thin air. Since it’s Open Source, I can modify the Bitcoin software, create a fake transaction, and send it to the cloud and hope it gets taken up by the network.

Not so fast! A block is just digital characters like a text document, and Bitcoin hashes each entire block. This hash is then passed along to become part of the next block, and so on to each new block as it’s created. So all blocks are linked together by this chain of recorded hashes, hence the blockchain. The secret here is that changing any hash along the way will cause all other blocks after to process to different hashes!

So my faked block will create a different blockchain than the real one, recorded out there in the cloud, even if every other transaction but my fake one is the same.  When my forgery is processed it will be found to have different hashes from the globally accepted ledger stored in the cloud. The phony is outed by the magic of cryptography, no third party to guarantee authenticity required. The entire blockchain breaks and falls apart like a jenga pile.

Boy, says Bitcoin, that shit just don’t add up.

While the blockchain hashing prevents fraud and counterfeiting, public key cryptography makes bitcoin secure. People think that any code can be broken, and they’re probably right. Public key cryptography goes around the problem by making it possible to break, but so insanely computationally expensive as to be pointless. Let’s just trust this and move on since it’s been used since the 1970s and has born the brunt of what hackers and the NSA can give it. It’s what’s already behind secure transactions on the internet, so you already depend on it without knowing it.

How it works within bitcoin is what’s interesting, because it controls your wallet. Symmetric cryptography, like Hitler’s engima machine, uses the same key to get stuff in and out. Capture one and you can not only decode messages, but send your own fake ones.

Public key cryptography in Bitcoin has two keys, a public key which is given out, and a private key held by the owner of the wallet. The public key is for encryption only, so it’s one way. Anyone can use this key to send money to your wallet, so it’s like an email address.

But only the holder of the private key can get access to what’s in the wallet to spend. The only security that is ever needed is to protect the private key.  This means that identity theft is impossible in a Bitcoin world, one more benefit of the trust that cryptography provides.

The essence of this innovation is that third parties are no longer needed to guarantee trust, and better yet, since it is done by what in essence is a mechanism, it’s incorruptible. And that’s something you can trust more than any human agency. This is what makes Bitcoin, whatever it’s ultimate fate (and price!), a truly epochal and potentially world remaking phenomenon.

Imagine there are no Bankers…you can do it if you try…

Posted in Personal reflections, Politics and Economics | Tagged | 2 Comments

Nonexistent Trend Du Jour

Paleo Retiree writes:

Philadelphia.

Posted in Politics and Economics | Tagged | Leave a comment

Master and Servant, Oligarch and Serf: The New Feudalism is Here

epiminondas writes:

In the irony of ironies, the very people who decried the pin-striped Wall Street banker and industrial captain are now in the driver’s seat. And the yawning chasm between the middle class and the power centers of the ruling knowledge industry is truly frightening. As this chasm grows, the middle class is disappearing rapidly.  And neither party seems to care. Here is an arresting article that gives you a tour of the middle class train wreck.

Posted in Politics and Economics | 2 Comments

Quote of the Day

epiminondas writes:

“Ineptocracy (in-ep-toc’-ra-cy) – a system of government where the least capable to lead are elected by the least capable of producing, and where the members of society least likely to sustain themselves or succeed, are rewarded with goods and services paid for by the confiscated wealth of a diminishing number of producers.” — Anon.

Posted in Politics and Economics | 2 Comments

Linkage

Paleo Retiree writes:

    • More fascinating thinking from HBD*Chick about inbreeding and outbreeding, this time as they pertain to Anglo-Saxon England.
    • Thanks to Twitter, Facebook and Instagram, we’re able to peep at the superdeluxe lifestyles of Mexican drug lords.
    • Will S. shares some revealing and funny Google auto-completes.
    • Camille Paglia on rape culture, Rihanna and Rob Ford.
    • Sasha Castel is hooked on “Boardwalk Empire.”
    • A good introduction to the erotic Japanese visual art form known as Shunga.
    • Do music and DNA share some characteristics? More generally: do language and the arts mimic/reflect/replicate the way genes and evolution work? (Entirely FWIW: I’ve always thought so.)
    • Time to start thinking once again about a Guaranteed Annual Income for everyone?
    • So maybe it’s women who do most of the slut-shaming …
    • Cathy Young reminds us that the Nobel Prize-winning novelist Doris Lessing, who died on November 17, once called Political Correctness a “self-perpetuating machine for dulling thought.”
    • Matt Forney visits NYC’s 9-11 Memorial and finds it a dreary place.
    • Smart stuff from, of all places, the left on how important the issue of immigration is, with some good tips about how best to think about it. More.
    • TechCrunch — in other words, an almost-mainstream outlet — takes some note of the Dark Enlightenment.
    • Give a listen to the magnificent sounds — half calliope, half cello quartet — of an instrument that Leonardo da Vinci designed but never built.
    • Steve Sailer has got me looking forward to Alexander Payne’s new movie. I loved Payne’s “Citizen Ruth” and “Sideways” but wasn’t crazy about “The Descendants” and “About Schmidt.”
    • Nigella Lawson: cokehead?
Posted in Linkathons | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments

Knockout Game Roundup

Fabrizio del Wrongo writes:

Last week The New York Times ran a story on “knockout game.” As Chuck Ross at Gucci Little Piggy pointed out, the piece cleverly shifted focus away from the effects of the punching attacks onto a debate about whether or not they constitute an actual “game” or even a trend. As Ross says:

It doesn’t actually really matter to the victims and to the worried public whether or not this is all a game with a set of rules that is discussed and hashed out by its players. What truly matters is whether people are getting beaten up for no reason other than the passing amusement of the perpetrators.

Over the last few days other outlets have joined in what I’m going to call — overstatement or not — an orgy of spin. I thought it’d be fun to take a look at some of the pieces.

Guess what? According to The Daily Beast, this whole thing is a “phony panic.” The gist of the piece, by Jamelle Bouie, is that “knockout game” isn’t worth talking about because it’s just not a trend. And the media should only talk about trends, like, presumably, our long national struggle against receipt hate, or the Klan’s infiltration of Oberlin College. Bouie is generous enough to admit that at least five people have been killed by punches that might have been thrown by partakers of the “game,” but he doesn’t see that as constituting a trend. I dunno. Five people. Seems a little trend-y to me, or at least somewhat newsworthy. The same number of people were killed during the 2001 anthrax attacks. That’s, like, five Trayvon Martins. It’s five times the number of geisha go-go dances performed by Katy Perry. It’s 83% of the total number of Obamacare sign-ups on the website’s first day.

Over at Slate, Matthew Yglesias, who was punched and kicked by a couple of guys, isn’t very curious about the motives of his attackers. He considers the unprovoked assault to be a “random act of criminality,” one of those things that just happens, like pimples or the NSA reading your emails. I’m unclear if Yglesias believes he was not a victim of the “knockout game” or if he simply thinks it’s wrong to see the game as something to be concerned about. His assertion — that since he was not knocked unconscious his attack was not an instance of “knockout game” — is self-evidently absurd. It’s still baseball if you strike out, Matt.

According to Emma Roller, also at Slate, the game is not worth talking about because there is no “hard data” to back it up. What, I wonder, would constitute “hard data”? Presumably it doesn’t include actual videos of the “game” being played and talked about in the communities in which it’s prevalent. Because there are plenty of those. Yglesias would probably call these videos “random evidence,” which, like a random act of criminality, is something barely worth thinking about. In any event, since the government has stopped including race information in the numbers it releases through its Bureau of Justice Statistics website, I’m going to go out on a limb and predict that the kind of data Roller is talking about will not be forthcoming. Actually, I’ll go even farther out on that limb and predict that no data on “knockout game” will be collected at all. And if there’s no data, per Roller there is no “game.” It’s just a fantasy, like leprechauns. So stop talking about it you big racist.

The truly bizarre thing in Roller’s piece is the assertion that Colin Flaherty of WorldNetDaily is almost singlehandedly responsible for spreading the myth of black crime. Also for the black rate of incarceration, which is pretty high. That’s alotta blame to lay on one dude, especially one who is an outsider with little-to-no mainstream pull. (I hadn’t even heard of him prior to a few days ago.) Roller seems to be forgetting that the “knockout game” story, at least as far as mainstream outlets are concerned, traces back to the Times. Prior to that piece the story was comfortably below the radar — and no one was being scolded about it. Besides, if black crime wasn’t a fertile and under-exploited topic, Flaherty wouldn’t have something to write about, would he?

Just for the sake of satisfying Ms. Roller’s yearning for long, hard data, I’ll link to an archived version of the Bureau of Justice’s data on homicide trends by race. As I mentioned, it’s no longer available on the regular site, so thanks are owed to Steve Sailer for pointing it out. Given these numbers, it’s amazing there aren’t more Colin Flaherties out there. More Steve Sailers, too. There’s a story here all right, but it doesn’t concern the truthiness of “knockout game.” It doesn’t even concern its racial aspects. It concerns the systematic way in which the media buries facts and stories contrary to its model, then attacks or discredits anyone who dares to complain about it.

Related

Posted in Books Publishing and Writing, Demographics, Politics and Economics | Tagged , , , , , | 9 Comments

Architecture Du Jour

Blowhard, Esq. writes:

Click on the image to enlarge.

St_Pancras_Renaissance_London_Hotel_2011-06-19The Midland Grand Hotel at St. Pancras Railway Station in London, completed in 1873. Designed by George Gilbert Scott who said, “It is possibly too good for its purpose.”

Posted in Architecture | Tagged , , , , , | 4 Comments