Blowhard, Esq. writes:
Here are a few snaps of Vegas neon from my latest trip there a few weeks ago. I shall not rest until I’ve collected every sign in the city.
Related
- My first gallery of Vegas neon.
- My post about Vegas’ Neon Boneyard.
Blowhard, Esq. writes:
Here are a few snaps of Vegas neon from my latest trip there a few weeks ago. I shall not rest until I’ve collected every sign in the city.
Related
Paleo Retiree writes:
Which do you find sexier? Britney’s new one:
Or this old Peggy Lee perf:
And why do you find one sexier and/or more pleasing than the other?
Paleo Retiree writes:
epiminondas writes:
It is becoming increasingly evident that we are putting the cart before the horse. We have great colleges BECAUSE we’re wealthy…not the other way around.
Blowhard, Esq. writes:
We’ve talked about polysemy several times, the phenomenon of one word having several meanings, some of which eventually come to overlap. An example is the word uncouth, the history of which we can chart with information from the OED. The word couth comes from a Germanic root meaning “known.”
Dates of Usage: Meaning of Uncouth
Old English–1650: unknown
Old English, now obsolete: unfamiliar or strange
1380–present: strange or unpleasant
1513–present: uncomely, awkward, clumsy
1542–present: rough, rugged
1694–present: unculturedNote how the meaning of uncouth moves from a particular condition to a description grounded in that condition. Something that is unknown becomes alien, strange, weird, rugged, rough, and finally, uncultured. Couth has since taken on an imagined status, as in the phrase “He’s got no couth.” The usage here is completely ahistorical. Future lexicographers may record couth as a word emerging in the late 20th century to mean “propriety, ability, culture, knowledge, or skill.”
Excerpted from Seth Lerer’s History of the English Language, 2nd Edition course guidebook
With this, they will take your warrants seriously. Or fall down laughing.
Paleo Retiree writes:
Paleo Retiree writes:
Jezebel blogger jeers at Reddit Red Pill guys for discussing how to “train” a girlfriend. Safe to assume that her next blogpost will denounce this current trend?
Related
Blowhard, Esq. writes:
I finally got around to checking out this crowdsourced collaboration written by Bret Easton Ellis, directed by Paul Schrader, and featuring Lindsay Lohan and James Deen. Lohan and Deen play dissolute, fringe Hollywood types engaged in various sexual manipulations of one another while ostensibly trying to produce a B-movie. There are a couple interesting moments and Schrader takes a few shots at those kids today and their iPhones ruining cinema, but the movie only just held my interest. Lohan is sexy as hell and shows she can still act, and Deen is an effective BEE sociopath, but Ellis’s script and Schrader’s direction seemed at odds to me. It feels like Ellis wants an American Psycho/50 Shades of Gray mash-up (at one point he was keen on adapting E.L. James’s mommyporn and even names Deen’s character “Christian” in a nod to her books) while Schrader wants something more like a sunlight-saturated SUNSET BLVD. Not that this should necessarily affect my view of the final product, but after reading the highly entertaining New York Times story about Schrader’s attempts to corral his starlet, I frequently found myself wishing Schrader released a documentary about the making of this film instead of the film itself. On the plus side, we got a few more scenes to add to the Naked Lohan montage hosted on DailyMotion.
Related
Fabrizio del Wrongo writes: