“A Perfect Getaway”

Paleo Retiree writes:

a-perfect-getaway-1024

High-spirited honeymoon-in-paradise-gone-bad thriller from 2009, directed by David Twohy and shot mostly in spectacular Kaui. The plot involves some friends — attractive young couples — hiking to a remote beach while killers are on the loose. There’s a wannabe-dazzling narrative switcheroo in the middle of the film that I couldn’t come close to buying, but the movie’s overall vibe is pleasingly playful — we’re here to mess with (and spoof) expectations and conventions … but we’re also going to deliver some real scares. The acting has wit and gumption — Milla Jovovich, Steve Zahn, Timothy Olyphant and Kiele Sanchez show a lot of confidence and inject bits of satire into their portrayals, yet they also manage to come up with some rough-and-genuine emotions when the moment calls for it. And the coast-and-jungle setting is as wondrous as can be. A fun junk movie.

Related

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Mark Knopfler of the Day

Paleo Retiree writes:

The studio track of this song is on Knopfler’s perfectly magnificent collection “The Ragpicker’s Dream.”

Posted in Music, Performers | Tagged | 1 Comment

Quote of the Day

Blowhard, Esq. writes:

lao-tzu-bird

The ordinary man is luminously clear,
I alone seem confused.
The ordinary man is searchingly exact,
I alone am vague and uncertain.

How nebulous!
as the ocean;
How blurred!
as though without boundary.

The masses all have a purpose,
I alone am stubborn and uncouth.

Lao Tzu, Tao Te Ching, trans. by Victor H. Mair

Posted in Philosophy and Religion | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Carolingian Minuscule and Modern Writing

Blowhard, Esq. writes:

Detail from the Charlemagne window at Chartres.

Detail from the Charlemagne window at Chartres.

In the 8th century, Charlemagne, the ruler of the Carolingian empire, had a problem on his hands. Over the centuries, scribes had made so many mistakes when copying the Bible and other texts of the Church fathers that dozens of different versions existed. This created theological difficulties. Charlemagne wasn’t sold on the whole idea of an omniscient God so he worried that if priests and other clerics weren’t praying in sufficiently good Latin, then God wouldn’t understand their prayers. For example, a priest who converted people had such garbled Latin that, to the extent anyone could understand him, he was blessing people “In the name of the Fatherland, and the daughter” as opposed to “In the name of the Father, and the Son.” Were these people going to hell because they weren’t baptized correctly? Some scholars argued they were.

eginhard

In an effort to alleviate copying errors and improve everyone’s Latin, a new way of writing, a new script, developed. Previously, scribes copied the Roman method of writing which was basically just a long string of letters — no spaces between words, pretty much all capital letters, and no punctuation. As you can imagine, this was very difficult to read.

A page from the Vergilius Vaticanus, a pagan work written in Roman Rustic script

A page from the Vergilius Vaticanus, a pagan work written in Roman Rustic script.

The Carolingians introduced spaces between words, the use of capital letters to mark the beginnings of sentences, and primitive punctuation to denote pauses and the ends of sentences. They also created a rounded and more readable handwriting called Carolingian minuscule.

An example of Carolingian minuscule.

An example of Carolingian minuscule.

Although Gothic script took over in the High Middle Ages, the Renaissance Humanists reintroduced Carolingian minuscule in the 13th and 14th centuries under the mistaken impression that it was a Roman innovation. The Humanists, whose strong dislike for all things medieval was counterbalanced by a deep veneration for all things ancient, thought something as beautiful as Carolingian minuscule couldn’t possibly have been produced during the grubby Middle Ages, it must have come from the ancients. Thus did this Carolingian innovation come to form the basis of our modern writing.

Related

Posted in Art, Books Publishing and Writing | Tagged , , , , | 5 Comments

Documentary Recommendations

Fabrizio del Wrongo writes:

Nature: My Life as a Turkey

I haven’t had much time to blog lately. Real life has kind of taken a dump on my internet profile. But I have managed to catch a few nice documentaries on Netflix Instant. Thought I’d pass the recommendations onto y’all before I go back to hiding in my closet.

“Homo Sapiens 1900”

This fascinating look at the history of eugenics, covering the beginnings of the movement with Darwin, through the work of his cousin Francis Galton, and into the era of the Nazis and Soviets, is invested with the sort of bomb-shelter quietude that marked Chris Marker’s great “La Jetee” — watching it is a bit like tuning into a transmission from some hidden nocturnal realm. The tone is incredibly dispassionate, and the pacing is so deliberate it’s almost hypnotic, like the verbal outpouring of an especially monotonic therapist. Happily, the content is free of inane talking heads, relying instead on primary sources. I learned a few things while watching it. For instance, I had no idea that Art Nouveau was an outgrowth of eugenics. Nor did I realize how neatly Sweden’s early twentieth-century interest in racial purity presaged Nazism. How is it that Sweden, the poster nation for hippy-dippy liberalism, has such a deep connection to Nazi Germany? And why did no one tell me about it in school? The reviews featured on Netflix are worth taking a look at. They reveal the instinctive revulsion that contemporary folks feel when encountering ideas that are natural outgrowths of Darwin’s writing. Their objections make me wonder: Was the Nazis’ killing of millions in the name of racial purity any worse than the Soviets’ killing of millions in the name of ideological purity? How did one end up being considered more awful than the other? Written and directed by Peter Cohen.

Continue reading →

Posted in Animals, Art, Movies, Politics and Economics, Science | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 11 Comments

Cocktail of the Day

Paleo Retiree writes:

ca_carpinteria_2013_08_slys_john_collins

A refreshing and elegant John Collins, enjoyed at this terrific retro-style steakhouse on the California coast. A John Collins is a Tom Collins, basically, only made with bourbon in place of the usual gin.

Our meal was much enhanced by a side of this:

ca_carpinteria_2013_08_slys_mayo_homemade

— homemade mayonnaise. Amazing how much richer and silkier the real thing is than the industrial stuff.

Posted in Food and health, The Good Life | Tagged , , , | 8 Comments

In-Charge Women and Slumping Men

Paleo Retiree writes:

Here’s a little scene I witnessed the other day at an airport:

Woman superior

There’s much to be remarked on in this photo where current relations between the sexes go. As for the woman: her attitude of wide-awake in-chargeness: her broadly-spread, crossed legs, as aggressive as a pro baseball player’s, taking up space purely for the pleasure of establishing a territorial claim; the CEO-in-the-making zigzag of her spine; the combo of intensity and aloofness in her facial expression, pressing her point home coldly and firmly. She’s all cockiness, assertiveness, impatience, guidance, and command. As for the b.f.: slumped-over, exhausted, submissive, soft and collapsed. What’s more to be said about him?

But what I found myself  focusing on was the placement of the woman’s right hand. Was she really rubbing and scratching the back of her man-boy’s head and neck? Yup, she really was. Here’s my reading of her gesture: She was stroking her b.f. as though calming, placating, soothing and controlling either a very young boy or a small, temperamental, and not very bright pet. She’s showing her man no more respect than she would a new purse. Maybe less, in fact: Hubby/b.f. as a lifestyle accessory.

In recent years I’ve witnessed many, many young women treating their men this way; and I’ve seen many, many young men accepting this kind of treatment — and, for all I know, even welcoming it.

It’s hard to convey how repulsive this looks to an old-timer, and by “old timer” I mean something like “any guy who did a little growing up before ’70s feminism.” I can assure readers that almost no man of my generation would allow himself to be treated like this by his woman. It can be mega-lovely to accept touching, stroking and attention from a lady-mate, god knows. But soothing is something that should happen in private, not public. And even when you do choose to accept some womanly warmth, affection and sympathy  — and if you aren’t going to get that from your woman, why are you bothering with her at all? — it’s something that you should never do submissively.

Were today’s young men never taught the meaning of the word “self-respect”?

Related

Posted in Photography, Sex, Trends, Women men and fashion | Tagged , , , , , , | 48 Comments

The Monopoly is Over

epiminondas writes:

The barriers to entry just got dynamited.  And the tremors are going to be felt everywhere.

Posted in Education | 6 Comments

Liberals in Hell

epiminondas writes:

You have to admire the sheer chutzpah of Bay Area liberals who continue to parade their PC credentials in the face of overwhelming reality. I have no doubt these brave fools would raise a huge stink if it were suggested they arm themselves.

Posted in Politics and Economics | 10 Comments

“Starship Troopers 3: Marauder”

Paleo Retiree writes:

StarshipTroopers3Maruaders (45)

Scrappy sequel to the brilliant Paul Verhoeven picture, directed this time by the first film’s screenwriter, Ed Neumeier. The movie was made on one-tenth the budget of the original and was shot in only 28 days, and the lack of physical resources shows — the film often looks like an episode of a TV series. And Neumeier’s inexperience (this was his first film as a director) shows in a tone that sometimes gets overly-knowing and jokey. All that said, I had a very good time. Much of the film’s satire is darned funny (and god bless satire generally); the cast (which includes Caspar Van Dien from the first movie, Jolene Blalock as an ultra-serious ship’s commander, and the ever beyond-fabulous Amanda Donohoe) digs in and delivers; the production design and effects are inventive in hilariously overambitious ways; and many of the film’s ideas are daringly berserk and demented.

Related

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments