“Gradiva”

Paleo Retiree writes:

Arielle Dombasle gives her all … as do many other cast members

A beyond-pretentious and dirty-minded Alain Robbe-Grillet art-sex movie from 2006. He made it at the age of 84! — gives an aging, dirty-minded man hope. An art historian in Morocco looking into Delacroix’s visit to North Africa finds himself — as people in literary art-sex works often will — drawn into a series of strangely sinister “Is it real or did I dream it?” games. Here, they concern spirits, a murder, an S&M parlor, corrupt police … Lots of Escher-like imagery, including arches, checkerboard patterns, stairways, and corridors; a lavish amount of skin; many S&M tableaux; recreations of Delacroix’s paintings and drawings; and numerous resettings of the terms of the film’s own narrative …

“Gradiva” gives the words “intellectual” and “oneiric” new meaning — people seem to be endlessly walking into and out of each other’s (strangely sinister) fantasies and stories. The film represents an intellectual’s idea of dream logic; it’s overlong; it’s very silly; it’s more of a literary man’s idea of what a movie should be than a movie in its own right; and it’s so flat-footedly directed that it really doesn’t work — although with Robbe-Grillet, who’s perversely proud of alienating any possible audience, how to explain what “not working” means in the case of his movies? Is his flat-footedness a deliberate strategy? Or does he just not have much of a directing gift? But, despite everything, I was amused by the film’s French-establishment high-faluting-ness and more than a little turned on by the abundance of chic, straight-faced, (strangely sinister) art-house nudity. The Wife and I both dozed off a few times watching the film, but neither of us minded. And god bless the performers for showing up and pitching in.

Watching the film got me musing … Having grown up during the ‘60s and ‘70s, and having been educated on a lot of modernist art, I get — and am capable of enjoying — a play of push-and-pull with narrative. The artist can draw the audience in and then pop ‘em out — and if he/she can do it strategically and shrewdly, this push-pull can become flirty and dance-like, a sophisticate’s way of spicing up the usual basics of identification and fantasy. But I have to confess that on some ultra-basic level I don’t get someone like Robbe-Grillet, who only wants to alienate the audience. He doesn’t feel an obligation to draw us in; he only wants to push us out. There’s no playfulness or wit, there’s no enhancement, there’s no heightening. It’s just tiresome — what’s in front of us is totally flat. So what’s the point? “There it is” — OK, sure. But really-really, what’s the point? Without the movie’s (strangely sinister) nudity and sexual provocations, there’d be nothing onscreen to enjoy at all.

Posted in Movies, Sex | Tagged , , , | 8 Comments

Question Lady Question

The Question Lady writes:

Do you expect to get all your digital entertainment for free? Or are you willing to pay for some of it — and why?

Posted in Personal reflections | 5 Comments

City Living and the Line at the Apple Store

Paleo Retiree writes:

Back in NYC for less than 24 hours after a couple of months away and already my brain is jangled, and my mind and eye are overstimulated …

On my walk this morning I stopped by the recently-reopened SoHo Apple Store to see how its redesign has turned out. Verdict: it’s just like the old SoHo Apple Store, only 30 feet deeper. The main thing to take note of, it turned out, was the crowd of eager shoppers lined up to buy iPhones. To my surprise, at least 3/4 of the people in the very long line were Asian — and most of them weren’t (at least judging by the languages they were speaking) Asian-American.

Continue reading →

Posted in Computers, Photography, The Good Life | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Ballplay

Fabrizio del Wrongo writes:

As I mentioned a few weeks ago, I’m currently enjoying a media blackout phase. Consequently, I’m trying to stay away from the television. Still, I sometimes have a nature show or something running in the background as I surf the web or shuffle disappointedly through profiles on OkCupid. Oh, I don’t really pay attention to it (I don’t really pay attention to OkCupid either). I experience what’s running mostly as audio-visual wallpaper; it’s about as consequential as that shit the stewardesses warn you about as you flip through “SkyMall” and wait for your damn flight to stop being delayed.

Wallpaper. That adequately describes the culture, doesn’t it? It’s wallpaperish. The internet, porn (or is “porn” just another word for the internet?), satellite radio, those pixely screens on the back of airplane seats, the full galaxy of television channels, smart phones — I sometimes feel as though popular culture has been reduced to white noise. A banal omnipresence is its most salient feature. But it’s also its raison d’être. Because we need its constant reinforcement, don’t we? We need it so we don’t stop paying attention to what’s important, like political parties or the latest warning from the Surgeon General. Because if we did that then the whole goddamn matrix might collapse in on itself, like a depressurized beer ball. And then who would fund global warming research?

Anyway, what I mostly take note of are the ads. You can learn a lot about things by watching the ads. Or at least you can if, like me, you’ve honed your cynicism to a fine, adamantine point. (In “The Matrix,” Neo needed a red pill and some kung fu to see through the bullshit. All I needed was alotta red wine and a few months of sexless wall climbing.) Below is one of my recent favorites. It’s an ad for sportscrap, but it’s also the most cutting critique of contemporary maleness I’ve ever come across.

Continue reading →

Posted in Personal reflections, Sex, Sports, Television, Women men and fashion | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 16 Comments

Linkathon

Paleo Retiree writes:

  • Will S. shares a good link and a good joke.
  • He also tries to make some sense of all the gal-teachers-having-sex-with-male-students stories that we’ve been seeing in the news recently.
  • Interesting population-analysis guy Peter (“Cliodynamics”) Turchin is following the Paleo Diet.
  • Funny, smart stuff from Toni Bentley at the expense of Naomi Wolf.
  • Steve Sailer picks through (and is drolly funny about) “The Master,” Paul Thomas Anderson’s ambitious new film.
  • A standup romp through history and cultures with Colin Quinn.
  • Someone has uploaded Bruce Weber’s evocative (and hard to find) personal-essay-style documentary about the jazz musician Chet Baker to YouTube.
Posted in Linkathons | Tagged , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

A Gallery of Vegas Weird

Blowhard, Esq. writes:

Alright, so the whole city is bizarro, but here are a few of the odder sights I saw on my trip.

First, one of the minibar offerings in my hotel room.

Continue reading →

Posted in Photography, Travel | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 13 Comments

Hooker Style, Cont.

Paleo Retiree writes:

Back here, Blowhard Esq. explored some of what tourist life is currently like in Vegas, with a special emphasis on what he called “hooker style.” My eyes having thus been opened, I was able to spot an inspiring example earlier today. She was walking into a small café, where she then ordered a cup of coffee.

But I’m not sure. Does her getup — which was quite striking, especially given how semi-slovenly everyone else was at 3 pm in and around this particular minimall — really qualify as “hooker style”? To me it doesn’t seem tacky or flashy enough. Her LBD (little black dress) … Her non-spike high heels … Pretty classy in their own way. Hence my verdict: What we have here is an example not of “hooker style” but of “escort style.” Important distinction!

Your evaluation?

Posted in Photography, Sex, Women men and fashion | Tagged , | 15 Comments

Question Lady Question

The Question Lady writes:

What does “existential” mean to you?

Posted in Uncategorized | 7 Comments

“Journey’s End”

Fabrizio del Wrongo writes:

Based on a play by R. C. Sherriff, the 1930 “Journey’s End” is a good example of a movie which benefits from its stage origins. It’s less a war film than a waiting-through-a-war film: for most of its length the camera remains penned inside a British dugout, the grime-smeared characters trapped in two-shot or three-shot or four-shot as they play cards and haggle over unsavory meat. (Meanwhile, ordnance zoots and claps on the soundtrack.) When director James Whale (this was his first film) breaks out of that setting in order to show a raid through no man’s land, the movie loses instead of gains tension. The sequence is jumbled and storyless, making you wonder why the action wasn’t kept offscreen or shown, like everything else, from the perspective of the trench. (Probably, the producers wanted a WOW! sequence to compete with “All Quiet On the Western Front” and “Westfront 1918,” both released the same year.) Combat is secondary here: it’s in the ant-like existence of the trench dwellers that the movie finds its theme. The character of the chief ant, Captain Denis Stanhope, was originated on stage by Olivier. Here he’s played by Colin Clive, who makes a veritable garment out of existential agitation. (Has any actor ever done overtaxed nudginess in quite the way Clive did?) Stanhope has been at the front a long time, and he’s managed to avoid cracking only by steeling himself against normalcy — he drinks a lot and abstains from talking about home. But he’s tested when childhood friend Raleigh is assigned to his unit. Played by a young, overly-scrubbed David Manners, Raleigh represents everything Stanhope is trying to squelch (he’s the embodiment of pre-war life), and when Stanhope is forced to send the young man on a probably fatal mission, his ambivalence provides “Journey’s End” with a shot of moral paradox. There’s a part of Stanhope that wants to see the kid destroyed, but it’s in conflict with his role as the unit’s commander — a role which is like a Bizarro World version of his peacetime office of chummy mentor. As a character Stanhope is in that fertile, Hemingway-bred tradition of boys who went to war to locate manhood but instead found emasculation, and with his drinking, his cynicism, and his angst at being turned into a human sausagemaker, he may have provided the model for the Richard Barthelmess character in “Dawn Patrol.” If you can forgive the shouty awkwardness of early sound acting, the performances here are pretty good, especially Ian MacLaren as a schoolteacher whose dapperness and collegiality are undiminished by the shells, the mud, and the dying.

Posted in Movies, Performers | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Cocktail Du Jour

Paleo Retiree writes:

I asked the bartender at a steakhouse where we ate recently what made this such a good Manhattan. “A few drops of Grenadine swirled in the shaker and then poured off,” she said.

“Is that really all?” I persisted.

“Well, what really makes it good is that it’s nearly all whiskey,” she said.

I asked the bartender at another steakhouse we ate at recently what made the above Old Fashioned so good, as well as so strong. (I snapped the photo at the moment when I was starting to feel tipsy — just a few sips in.)

“What you’re probably picking up is that our basic Old Fashioned is a double,” she said.

The wisdom of the bartender.

  • My favorite cocktail blogger is film-noir and crime-fiction buff Vince Keenan.
  • Novelist and filmmaker Lloyd Fonveille enjoys sharing retro pleasures too.
Posted in Food and health, The Good Life | Tagged , , , | 4 Comments