Helicoptering

Fabrizio del Wrongo writes:

You hear a lot about helicopter parenting these days. The term refers to the tendency of contemporary parents to monitor and assist their adorable little meat spores at every micro-stage of their development — to cajole and fertilize and prune them, like anthropomorphic bonsai trees. I’ve dated a few products of helicopter parenting. Odd experience. The girls were both hyper-confident and exceedingly fragile; they were glittering yet brittle, like people made of glass. I think this was largely because their sense of self was based almost entirely on external validation — on the attention they received from parents and teachers and boyfriends. And so they were like overgrown teacher’s pets, constantly striving for the comforting buzz of an A-plus grade or a silver star, and yet never quite knowing why. In their lack of introspection and basic feeling for others, they scarcely resembled people at all.

I think that’s partly why I find this ad for Google’s Chrome to be so loaded. Have a look:

Continue reading

Posted in Computers, Education, Humor, Personal reflections, Television | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 8 Comments

Question Lady Question

The Question Lady writes:

Do you think that watching the news makes people more — or less — empathetic about disasters?

Posted in Personal reflections | 7 Comments

Down These Mean Streets a Man Must Go…

Blowhard, Esq. writes:

Here are a few pics of some notable L.A. landmarks from my trip there a couple weeks ago (previous installments here and here). First, Union Station.

Continue reading

Posted in Architecture, Movies, Photography | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 9 Comments

Butt World

Paleo Retiree writes:

Butts are a big, big part of contempo popular culture. How, why and when did that happen?

Posted in Personal reflections, Photography, Sex | Tagged , , | 4 Comments

Linkathon

Paleo Retiree writes:

Posted in Computers, Food and health, Linkathons, Movies, Politics and Economics, Sex | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Letter from China: Amateur Anthropology

Fenster writes:

It is hard for the mind to grasp itself since it is inside looking out.  Consider the case of that poor neuroscientist I wrote about here, who had to reason through that he was a sociopath on the basis of data about his own mind.

Sometimes, though, you can have an experience that suggests something of how the gears work.  Like when you have a name on the tip of your tongue.  Who was that actor in the remake of 3:10 to Yuma?

Aussie Aussie Aussie Aussie.

R. R. R. R. Raymond?

Richard? Robert? Russell?  Russell?!

C. C.

Crowe!

Why does the R seem right somehow, and how does it head you to the name?

Better yet, consider the experience of apprehending a visual illusion, like the famous one of the old crone and the young woman.

Here, there’s a flickering that goes on as your mind shifts perspectives.  Flick.  Crone.  Flick.  Young woman.  You can feel it.

Something very similar happens in the process of cultural immersion—amateur anthropology, if you will.

My entire gestalt since arrival in China has been that of a stranger in a strange land.  Yes the people smile and carry themselves in recognizable ways.  Yes there are buildings with windows and doors and rooms, and the rooms have furniture like chairs and couches.  But everything is different—that is, it is the differences that come to the front of mind, and dominate.

It doesn’t help that the Chinese style of interior decoration seems derived from David Lynch—no conversation pits, just chairs and couches pushed back as far as possible to the walls, leaving an existential open space that is faintly threatening.

without the zig zag rug of course

I am in China at a meeting with university officials discussing higher education research in China.  I’ve been here for over a week now, in constant communication with the Chinese and only the Chinese, and still am the stranger in  a strange land.  The room has the David Lynch look.

As always, I have my translator with me, who doubles as guide and, increasingly, friend.  We are conversing through the translator, back and forth when . . .

Flick.

These are just people that I know.

The feeling is as palpable as the shift from crone to woman with hat.  Cool!  Then . . .

Flick.

Stranger in a strange land.

Flick.

Friends talking.

Flick.

Stranger in strange land.

I think this means I am in the “no mountain” stage I discussed here.

The experience of perspective shifting is pleasurable in its own right.  And it also suggests something interesting about how the mind works, the importance of perspective in understanding and how experience works in tandem with learning and growth.

I can feel it, Dave.  It is rather satisfying.

Posted in Travel | Leave a comment

That Video on r/gonewild or PornHub Yet?

Blowhard, Esq. writes:

From what I can tell, the great thing about this technology is the ease with which you can share data. So do you wanna remind people that with a simple tap their homemade porn will be all over the Internet?

Posted in Technology | Tagged , , | 3 Comments

Camille Paglia’s “Glittering Images”

Blowhard, Esq. writes:

Camille Paglia — professor, provocateur, scourge of leftist academics and feminists — has a new book on visual art and was in town recently to lecture on it.

I trekked over to the Skirball Cultural Center on the westside.

Us fancy L.A. intellectuals milled about the lobby before the show.

La Paglia was 15 minutes late. She came out — black shirt, jeans, black boots, and black leather jacket — and said, “I wrote this book because…” and proceeded to talk for about 40 minutes straight with hardly a breath.

Her lecture was basically all the main points from the book’s  and a healthy mix of shots at her favorite targets, like a rock band plugging the new album while also including a few greatest hits. As predictable as the jabs at academe, Gloria Steinem, and French poststructuralists may have been, the crowd (including your humble correspondent) ate it up, hooting along as she delivered her barbs. But hey, don’t take my word for it, you can watch the lecture here. And here’s some more photos of the event.

As for the book itself, I finished it today and enjoyed it quite a bit. Paglia would probably chafe at this characterization but her book felt like a series of blog posts. Each chapter begins with an image and is followed by a 3-5 page essay that weaves together the work’s history, context, and her own interpretation. Because one of her explicit aims is to show people that art belongs to everyone, her writing is clear, accessible, and jargon-free. I don’t know about you, but my visual art eduction from K-12 was nonexistent. We’re schooled in literature and exposed to a wide range of classics, but visual art and music fall by the wayside. I’m guessing this is at least partly explained by our Protestant tradition that reveres the written word but is suspicious of images. It wasn’t until I took an elective survey course in college that the worlds of sculpture, painting, and architecture were opened up to me.

One of the stand-out chapters for me was of an artist I had never heard of previously, Tamara de Lempicka.

Not only did Limpicka work in one of my favorite styles, Art Deco, she had a hell of an interesting life:

With her haute couture and Garbo cheekbones, Lempicka did not disguise her naked ambition for social prestige as well as commercial success. Her sophisticated persona was the antithesis of scrabbling bohemian mythos. She attended and threw lavish, risqué parties in Paris and expertly manipulated the media for maximum publicity. Arrogant and opinionated, she never deferred to men in the art world or courted romances with male artists. As detailed in Laura Claridge’s riveting 1999 biography, Lempicka was a liberated new woman with her own agenda, which included cocaine-fueled bisexual adventures in seedy riverside bars.

Art deco and cocaine-fueled bisexual adventures? I almost broke the Internet, I hit that Amazon 1-Click button so hard.

By the way, if any of these works or style looks familiar, you’ve likely seen them before.

Posted in Art, Books Publishing and Writing, Education | Tagged , , , , , , , | 16 Comments

Fenster Endorses!

Fenster writes:

The last thing this blog should be is a political one.  Little danger of that actually, considering the readership and writership.  And while I am a political junkie I have been careful not to use this as a platform to spout.  I get enough of that from Facebook friends.

But there comes a time to stand and deliver and this is about time.

Fenster endorses (drumroll) . . . . . ummm . . . .

Hold on! Hold on!  Not so fast!  Let me kind of duck that question and refer you to a most superlative Economist endorsement, out today.

It is as nearly perfect an account of the way I see the race–and the issues that are truly important animating the race–as I can imagine.  I urge you to incorporate its reasoning into your thinking in its entirety.

It’s all there.

Romney more serious on deficit: check.

But Romney stuck with no-tax approach to same: check

Obama’s foreign policy record better than the right says: check

But Obama is “aloof and disengaged” and “no master diplomat”: check

Romney may actually be a moderate and may govern accordingly: check

But Romney’s right flank is downright scary, way scarier than Obama’s left, and may drag Romney where it wants him: check.

Obamacare coverage of uninsured a good thing: check

But Obamacare’s ducking of medical costs a bad thing: check.

It is equally important what is left out of this endorsement.  I yield to no man in my appreciation of issues such as women’s rights, the pill, abortion and gay marriage.  But for me at least they are down, down, down the list of truly important issues for the nation, especially in a presidential race.

The Economist ends up endorsing Obama, but by the razor thinnest of margins.  Indeed, it would do no injustice to the logic of the article if it concluded in its final paragraph to endorse Romney.

As to Fenster, he cannot quite summon it up to endorse Obama.  But he endorses The Economist.  This post is about politics, so it can be as ambiguous as it likes.

Posted in Politics and Economics | 5 Comments

Return On Investment

Fabrizio del Wrongo writes:

 

Pop culture can be stultifying. It grinds us down, appeals to our lowest impulses, sometimes sells us out. But every once in a while it manages to harness the full weight of its resonances, to sort of trade in on what it’s deposited in our imaginations. And when it does that it can hit us right where we live. A moment like this makes all of “Star Trek” worthwhile. It even manages to redeem that dopey “live long and prosper” thing.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , | 9 Comments