Europe Seems to Have a Thing Right Now for Twin, White, Abstract Towers

Blowhard, Esq. writes:

Here are the “Torres de Hercules” in Spain, designed by Rafael de La-Hoz Architects.

Pretty terrible, but nothing compared to the Bella Sky Hotel in Denmark, designed by a Danish firm called 3xn. This website calls it “a tasteful and warm Scandinavian home.”

I defy anyone to point to a single feature that’s “warm.” Or “tasteful.” It’s a German expressionist-by-way-of-Scandinavia nightmare.

What are the worst eyesores you’ve seen lately?

Posted in Architecture | Tagged , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Question Lady Question

The Question Lady writes:

How do you manage your brain?

Posted in Personal reflections | 5 Comments

Ippudo NY

Paleo Retiree writes:

The Wife and I ate at this highly-praised Japanese restaurant the other evening and thought it more than lived up to the hype, delivering a lot of chic theater and scene-y fun, as well as the best ramen we’ve ever had. The first-class sweet-potato-derived shochu I was served featured poetic campfire overtones, and didn’t hurt the experience one little bit.

A few visuals:

What’s the best meal you’ve had out recently?

Posted in Food and health, The Good Life | 5 Comments

Linkathon

Paleo Retiree writes:

Posted in Computers, Demographics, Politics and Economics, Science | Leave a comment

What’s Going to Become of Higher Ed?

Paleo Retiree writes:

Randall Parker thinks that higher education may be the next bubble to pop.

Speaking of education and innovation, be sure to take a look at MRUniversity, a new venture by Alex Tabarrok and Tyler Cowen, the two economist-proprietors of the justly-popular Marginal Revolution blog. Free online courses in econ is the vision here. I’m following along with the outfit’s first course myself. Alex and Tyler are among the most helpful and culture-aware economists I know of.

Eager to hear what our co-blogger Fenster (who has mucho experience in the higher-ed field) makes of these developments.

Posted in Education | Tagged , , , | 5 Comments

Quote Du Jour

Paleo Retiree writes:

The best thing I’ve read today comes from Rolling Stone’s Matt Taibbi:

With 300 million possible entrants in the race, how did we end up with two guys who would both refuse to bring a single case against a Wall Street bank during a period of epic corruption? How did we end up with two guys who refuse to repeal the carried-interest tax break? How did we end with two guys who supported a vast program of bailouts with virtually no conditions attached to them? Citigroup has had so many people running policy in the Obama White House, they should open a branch in the Roosevelt Room. It’s not as bad as it would be in a Romney presidency, but it comes close.

A pox on election season generally.

Posted in Politics and Economics | Tagged , | 3 Comments

And Who Mourns Vaudeville?

Brundle Guy writes:

The times, they are a-changing, as the man once sang. They certainly are for the industry I work in, comic book publishing. It’s odd, in a time where comics have greater cultural cache than ever before, the publishing end struggles. There are a lot of reasons. The direct market is having the same trouble all other retail businesses are and we don’t have many alternatives. Online store sales do all right for trades but not single issues, the benchmark of success for our industry. Digital copy purchases on the few titles available are nowhere near the cost of production, much less enough to make a profit, especially with how people don’t like paying full price for digital copies.

This leads to a lot of doom and gloom forecasting in certain circles, and while I might not necessarily say that the doom and gloomers are absolutely incorrect, I think they’re slightly off-base. I don’t think comics are going away, I just don’t think they’ll be exactly the way they are now for very much longer. And that’s probably OK.

Even in addition to the points above, the standard monthly comic increasingly seems like an outmoded form. In an age where people can throw down a few bucks a month to have instant access to hundreds if not thousands of movies and television shows, what sense does it make to pay four dollars for one part one of a 14-part story, like so many “decompressed storytelling” comics are today? And although bitching about how expensive comics are is a favorite pastime amongst fans, it’s really difficult to make them much less expensive. Instead of the old days, where a team of staff artists in a room made pages for comics that sold potentially millions of copies in groceries and corner stores in every town all over the country, now pages are drawn by incredible artists from all over the world for comics that are sold in a much smaller number of sometimes difficult to find specialty shops and are extraordinarily lucky if they have the very rare privilege to sell in six-figure numbers.

Also, our fans are getting old. A recent survey of DC comic sales found that only around 2% of their audience was under 18, and the average age of their reader was 35, I’ve even heard some say higher. A hefty portion of the fan letters I read begin “I’ve been reading comics for 25 years.” And there’s barely any attempt to reach a newer or younger audience. We’ll simply increase the age of our target marketing and ad sales.

It all doesn’t seem terribly sustainable. At the same time, comics were at this point before, and the change to the direct market turned it all around. Perhaps we’ll find that change again. But I think this time that change will not just be in the distribution method, but will change the very essence and nature of comics themselves.

I was talking about this with a friend of mine who is a big comic nerd, and she got terribly depressed. Even though I, too, love comics, and not only that, but at the moment they’re my livelihood, I can’t get too upset. Think about Vaudeville, I told her. I love the idea of Vaudeville, and whenever a show or film or play infuses itself with a bit of Vaudeville, it always makes me happy. But do I miss the Vaudeville circuit? Do I still wish there were entertainers out there pushing, struggling and starving to keep alive an art form whose best features were absorbed by other mediums decades ago? No, I don’t. I’m more than happy to see people like Jackie Chan and Jason Statham and Adam McKay keeping bits and pieces of that spirit alive.

So, is my industry dying? Yeah, maybe, kinda, in a way. Is that necessarily a bad thing? Nope, I don’t think so.

Still, it’s strange to be standing here at this odd moment of transition. No one knows what the landscape’s going to look like five years from now. That’s a bit wild, really. So perhaps I’ll write more on this, sort of keep tabs on an industry as it weebles and wobbles to see if it ever falls down.

Could be an interesting story.

Posted in Books Publishing and Writing, Personal reflections | Tagged , , , , | 8 Comments

Linkathon

Paleo Retiree writes:

Posted in Computers, Demographics, Linkathons, Movies, Music, Science, Sex, The Good Life | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Question Lady Question

The Question Lady writes:

How many cat photos/videos have you seen on the internet?

Posted in Personal reflections | 3 Comments

The Case for Interventions

Sir Barken Hyena writes:

Here’s a sad case that I think brings up some difficult questions:

http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2012/10/02/fire-kills-1-badly-burns-another-in-extreme-hoarding-intervention-gone-awry/

“An extreme hoarding situation ended in extreme sadness on Tuesday. It may have been a final act of defiance that killed a man and seriously injured his sick mother…

An intervention was apparently already underway in connection with the clutter inside.  A dumpster on site was supposed to be used to house the many belongings the occupants had amassed. The fire, apparently set by the son, broke out just hours before state social workers were supposed to arrive, police said.”

Now, the article is short on details, no doubt because this just happened. But these are some of the questions I have:

  • Just how far does the right of a person to live the way they choose go?
  • Are we justified in intervening in cases like this because of the reasonable desire of the neighbors not to live next to an eyesore like this house apparently was?
  • Is it justified because of health concerns, such as disease or rats?
  • Is it justified because it’s wrong for society to stand by and let people live in such squalid conditions?
  • Are people who choose to live like that incompetent in a legal sense and therefore don’t have the rights the rest of us have?
  • If so, what kind of harm has to be done to justify removing the rights the rest of us have?
  • I know that if I lived next door to a house like this I wouldn’t like it. But, also, so what?
  • Does that mean I can, as a mere citizen, sick the authorities after them? Doesn’t that escalate the issue to the realm of force?
  • Is it in fact inhumane to allow this kind of situation to continue?
  • And, who’s responsible when things go awry like this? It seems the son started the fire but when an intervention goes like this wouldn’t have been better to have left them alone?

What do you think? I’m kind of alarmed at the way we’re empowered to get in each other’s face these days. A certain amount of live and let live is going to have to be revived…and yet go too far with that and a lot of bad things can happen. My wife used to do meal deliveries for the old and sick, and sometimes went to houses that were like this. Once I went with her on her rounds and there was one apartment with a very old and sick lady living alone that was pretty bad. I found it very distressing, but I’m not sure it would have been better for her if someone had intervened either. It’s sad, but is tearing someone’s independence away from them the answer? It all makes my head hurt.

Posted in Philosophy and Religion, Politics and Economics | 3 Comments