Notes on “White God”

Fabrizio del Wrongo writes:

white_god

Artists have used animals to comment on the human condition since Homer. There’s often something to be gained in recognizing that animals experience the world through alien eyes — that their existence isn’t necessarily contingent on the exigencies of culture, civilization, etc. Perhaps that realization is part of what makes us human. In “White God,” Hungarian writer-director Kornél Mundruczó uses animals not to comment on our experience but to indict it. It’s an almost anti-human film, one that owes as much to the exploitation-bred revenge fantasies of Quentin Tarantino as to the frontier yarns of Jack London.

Narratively, Mundruczó borrows the strategy of the recent “Planet of the Apes” reboot: He encourages us to identify with his dogs, then marinates us in their suffering. All of that suffering is caused by humans, each one portrayed by an actor who seems chosen for his ability to fill out a dastardly outline. By the movie’s final third you’re primed for bloodletting. There’s no suspense or prurient horror-movie kick to the inevitable dog-on-human violence; it’s grim, hard-edged stuff. And I fear you’re supposed to experience satisfaction, or perhaps even a vicarious thrill, as you watch the wrongdoers get their comeuppance. It’s become common for movies to revel in the persecution of ideological malefactors. The victims in “White God” are stand-ins for nationalists: it’s made clear they favor Hungarian purebreds. Am I the only one who finds this trend off-putting?

The best moments in the movie are those in which the dogs are shown roaming the streets, doing dog things, and seeming to act according to a script and direction. Here Mundruczó reveals a psychological sensitivity that compliments his grasp of tone and detail. You can feel him inside the animals’ heads, the way Carroll Ballard is in his best movies, and George Miller was (in a very different way) in his great “Babe: Pig in the City.” It’s a pity that sensitivity doesn’t extend to his human subjects. There’s a complimentary story in “White God,” concerning a little girl and her estrangement from her father and pooch, but it lacks resonance, and it’s overpowered by the revenge material. It has a nice capper, though: A mystical scene in which the girl soothes the wild beasts. It wouldn’t be out of place in one of the Grimms’ fables.

About Fabrizio del Wrongo

Recovering liberal arts major. Unrepentant movie nut. Aspiring boozehound.
This entry was posted in Animals, Movies and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Notes on “White God”

  1. peterike says:

    I’ve been thinking about watching this film. Now I know I don’t want to see it.

    Like

  2. Pingback: “Get Out” | Uncouth Reflections

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s