Fabrizio del Wrongo writes:
I still haven’t become totally accustomed to crass advertising. I suppose I should like it, but mostly I feel unsettled by it. The last thing I want to be thinking about while watching The History Channel is some burly guy’s balls and the way they’re accomodated by the gusset of his jeans. (“Gusset” is an evocative word, isn’t it? I think it’s great. But should it really be used in reference to manly jeans? I associate it with porny writing, and almost always in reference to women’s panties.)
Plus, I’m not much of a fan of baggy jeans. I likes ’em to actually fit, ball comfort be damned. But maybe I’m the weird one, and maybe wearing form-fitting jeans is, like, gay or something. Keep in mind that all those tough ancient Romans wore skirts and togas and shit like that. Maybe it was so their balls would stay comfortable. Maybe ball comfort has been a secret driver of culture throughout history and Jared Diamond will write a book on it someday.
Then again, there’s this. But then Connery can make anything seem manly.

