Fabrizio del Wrongo writes:
The posters for Brigitte Bardot’s films constitute their own little genre of graphic design.
Which do you like best?
The Question Lady writes:
Are you instinctively more of a monotheist or a polytheist?
The Question Lady writes:
How important to you are your hobbies? And how would you define a hobby?
Blowhard, Esq. writes:
Following Paleo Retiree’s post, this crossed my desk this morning:
Clearly an attempt to ape this:
Maybe Apple should sue?
The Question Lady writes:
How do you think the internet will change in the next 5 years?
Glynn Marshes writes:
Trouble on the literary scene!
A couple of Brit writers–RJ Ellory and Stephen Leather–were caught posting sock puppet reviews on Amazon.
Their probable undoing: they didn’t stop at giving their own books 5 stars. They also posted negative reviews of other authors. Heh.
Now a “group of leading British authors” (49 in all) “including bestselling writers Ian Rankin, Lee Child, Susan Hill, Val McDermid and Helen FitzGerald” are mounting a spirited assault against fake book reviews.
Their plan of attack, naturally: write a letter.
“These days more and more books are bought, sold, and recommended online, and the health of this exciting new ecosystem depends entirely on free and honest conversation among readers . . .
“But some writers are misusing these new channels in ways that are fraudulent and damaging to publishing at large.
“Few in publishing believe they are unique. It is likely that other authors are pursuing these underhand tactics as well.”
(According to the article, btw, Ellory has sold over a million books. Can you imagine sitting on those kinds of cumulative sales numbers, and then wasting your time playing sock puppet games on Amazon?)
Paleo Retiree writes:
At my previous place of blogging I often marveled at what I called “nonsense brackets” — the tendency many graphic designers have these days of inserting parenthesis marks or brackets into their work for no grammatical/linguistic reason. (See here and here for examples of my musings.) They do it instead for visual heightening and because, with its overtones of computer code, the move confers coolness on their work.
Fun, if in a dismaying way, to see the trend making its way further into the mainstream. The other day, for instance, I went out to pick up some food and found that Ralphs, a west coast grocery chain, has embraced the trend whole hog.
Hats off, I guess, to the people doing the graphics for Ralphs for succeeding in making what were once edgy tropes seem perky and inane. Such, come to think of it, were probably their marching orders. Middle America likes perky and inane, and if you want to sell to them …
I’ll call attention to four things in the collage above.
I don’t know what to make of this mess except to marvel at how common it’s become for computer-things to be foregrounded in commercial art, and at how for-granted we take this fact. You’ve probably noticed the number of TV ads that imitate/steal-from the iPad with its swipes and its pinching effects, for another example.
As far as I can tell, popular culture these days exists in order to exalt the digital gadgets with which popular culture is now created. Bizarre, and ‘way too self-reflexive and endlessly-recursive for my tastes. But I’m sure I’m missing many things here. What are your theories about what it all signifies?
Blowhard, Esq. writes:
In the comments of my last post, Sir Barken Hyena said that, “SoCal is stupid nice.” Well, parts of it certainly are. On the other hand, some areas are architectural wastelands. This especially seems to be the case with many of our government civic centers that date from the post-WWII era. Here’s a tour of one I know well, the Santa Ana Civic Center.
Sir Barken Hyena writes:
I’m not predicting who will win in November. We’ll see soon enough. I’m making a prediction about what will happen if the Romney/Ryan ticket wins.
So there you are, pretty bold, eh? My assumption is that the current political state of things is so sclerotic that there’s no hope of saving it. What’s required would tax a young system full of energy. What we have is more Grandpa Simpson than Jack LaLanne. Therefore the Ship of State will continue steaming Full Speed Ahead! It’s no more viable than the Ancien Regime was in 1789.
The Question Lady writes:
What’s the most pretentious movie ever made?