It’s Tough Being a Positivist

Fenster writes:

Over at the Unz Review, Razib Khan has a realization:

A few days ago I joked on Facebook that life isn’t about the score up on the board, but standing with your team. By this, I have come to the position that when it comes to arguments and debates the details of the models and facts, and who even wins in each round, is irrelevant (barring extinction) when set against the value and gains to group cohesion. In the middle 2000s a friend advised that I should be more explicitly partisan and ideological, because that is how I could gain friends and allies in my hour of need.

In my short jaunt through Theory writ large I have finally come that conclusion as well. I am a naive realist and a positivist. I work under the assumption that there is a world out there, that that world out there manifests itself in the order we see when we decompose it with analysis and empirical methods. As long as I kept my eyes on prize, the “score,” I felt at peace.

This was dangerously naive. Whereas before I had worked under the hypothesis that my interlocutors were falling prey to cognitive biases when they engaged in ad hominem or logical fallacy, I am now coming to suspect that one some level they are aware that they are engaging in the dialectics of ultimate victory. Every battle they lose is simply another opportunity to shore up their forces in future battles. Just like Rome against Hannibal, their contention that the structure of human society, rather than the world “out there,” is determinative, may very well be true in relation to all that matters.

It is ironic–or is it?–that positivists don’t see the awkwardness of their own positions.  A positivist view leads Khan to understand ideas as a part of culture and as culture as part of evolution.  And since that idea seems sound it is deemed immune from the lowly Darwinian push and pull that may characterize the idea of others.  Having that insight is exhilarating as it represents a kind of ascent from the mud.  But it also tempts the thinker to forget that ideas undistilled by pressures are rare indeed–if indeed they exist at all.

Here’s an article from Joseph Henrich on the dynamic between culture and biological evolution.  And a quote:

Culture, cultural transmission, and cultural evolution arise from genetically evolved psychological adaptations for acquiring ideas, beliefs, values, practices, mental models, and strategies from other individuals by observation and inference. Thus, the first step in theorizing is to use the logic of natural selection to develop hypotheses about the evolution and operation of our cultural learning capacities.

I am actually not so sure that Khan is right in thinking that everyone is aware that they are engaged in “the dialectics of ultimate victory.”  It is much more plausible to think that both Razib and the people he wonders about are equally stymied by the noses in front of their respective faces.

We observe that people’s ideas are moored in things other than ideas.  And yet we insist that “the idea”–the unsullied idea, the correct idea–triumph.  But that’s not logical, Captain.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Notes on “The Kingdom of Speech”

Fenster speaks:

The Kingdom of Speech, Tom Wolfe’s idiosyncratic reading of evolution, linguistics and language, ends with a paean to speech.  SPEECH! 

(Note to editor: italicize that word for emphasis.  Capitalize it of course.  And, since this is speech, we need a spoken exclamation point too, Victor Borge’s ssssh  ptt.)!

Continue reading

Posted in Science | 2 Comments

Naked Lady of the Week: Annette Haven

Fabrizio del Wrongo writes:

ah-cover

Annette Haven was probably the classiest and most sophisticated of the golden-age porn stars. While looking through some of her old clips I was struck by her worldliness. How many modern-day erotica stars would you describe as worldly? Probably none.

Worldliness was inherent in Annette’s fiber, her spirit: Even when she was too young to be playing the foxy older lady, she was playing the foxy older lady. And in these cruel days, when moms and teachers are being sent to prison for the charitable act of sleeping with young men, the foxy older lady is an archetype worth rooting for.

Besides, worldliness yields benefits both aesthetic and practical. To wit: No one in contemporary porn sucks dick the way Annette sucked dick. That is, sans spitting and gagging, and certainly sans mascara-ruining histrionics, but with plenty of tactfulness, knowingness, and soul.

Am I alone in thinking that Annette and Anne Hathaway look a bit similar? The first thing I thought upon discovering Hathaway was: “Oh, she looks like Annette Haven!”

Allegedly, Brian De Palma nearly cast Haven in the role in “Body Double” that eventually went to Melanie Griffith. “I don’t know if there’s any good young porno stars out here,” said De Palma, “but the older ones—Annette Haven, Seka—some of them can really act. And Annette Haven has a terrific body.” De Palma has always been a keen judge of female flesh.

Nudity below. Have a great weekend.

Continue reading

Posted in Sex | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Noma Two Ways

Paleo Retiree writes:

René Redzepi at Noma

I recently watched and enjoyed “Noma: My Perfect Storm,” Pierre Deschamp’s documentary about René Redzepi, the brilliant chef behind Noma, an avant-garde Copenhagen restaurant that’s often been called the best restaurant in the world. Inspired and curious, I snooped around afterwards to see if I could turn up more docs on the same topic. It turns out that Anthony Bourdain devoted an episode of “Parts Unknown” to Redzepi and Noma. I watched that show too.

“Noma: My Perfect Storm” is in the high-art mode of “El Bulli” and “The Birth of Saké,” two food docs I’ve written about elsewhere on this blog (here and here). It’s a very controlled, hushed piece of work. The colors are pale and highly-buffed, with the near monochromaticism set off by spare splashes of juicy, intense red and green. The score is that modern cliché: slowly-swirling, chic New Age sounds that indicate otherworldly rapture. There’s an almost relentless emphasis on clarity of the most subtle kind. And Redzepi himself is presented as a dour, difficult philosopher-artist, a visionary bent on opening the world to new vistas of thought and experience. “There’s an element of Mozart to him,” says one interviewee. “He has this automatic access to genius.” Food, thought, pleasure, ideas: it’s all one, One, ONE …

The film’s title refers to a stretch when Noma lost a ratings star. Will it be able to win it back? This episode in the restaurant’s history is presented as an agonizing metaphysical crisis — an occasion for introspection and spiritual striving — on the order of “The Seventh Seal.” Racism (Redzepi’s dad is an immigrant of Albanian ethnicity) doesn’t fail to get explored as a likely factor in our genius’ history and drives …

OK, I’m having a bit of a giggle at the movie’s expense, and I do think some snickering is warranted. Goodness, how much straight-facedness is a person expected to tolerate while watching a food documentary? Nonetheless, I mean no real disrespect: the movie is very enjoyable for what it is. Its high-art manner doesn’t feel affected or put-on, and Deschamps is a genuinely elegant filmmaker. And, in case anybody cares, I’m beyond-OK with thinking of a chef as a great artist and creator. Besides, if this isn’t an era when food is culturally paramount and food documentaries have become a major film genre, I don’t know what it is. Verdict: if you’re in the mood for a beautifully crafted, somewhat austere look at a remarkable chef and his restaurant — I haven’t eaten at Noma and never will, but even onscreen the food that Redzepi creates comes across as conceptually and visually astounding — you could do a lot, lot worse.

It’s quite startling how completely different an experience the Bourdain episode is. It’s in Bourdain’s typical ’60s-New-Journalism/travelogue mode: earthy, jazzy, wisecracking, quick-witted and informal. The food is the same, much of the information is identical, and many of the characters we run into are familiar. But the tone of the piece is such a contrast that even Redzepi comes off very differently. In Deschamp’s movie Redzepi is a tortured, bold-yet-hesitant introvert; in Bourdain’s episode he’s enthusiastic, resilient and convivial — a brilliant creator to be sure, but also an earthy host and showman. The making of meals here isn’t a matter for slow-motion spiritual contemplation (although there’s that too); it’s 90% a question of getting up early, working long hours, handling organic ingredients, inspiring your staff, and doing your best to delight people’s digestive tracts while keeping a business afloat. Oh, and remembering to enjoy a personal life. That too.

The episode is beauty, by the way — a standout even among Bourdain’s many terrific TV shows. Despite his flip, macho swagger and punk-inflected wryness, Bourdain finds himself downright captivated: by Redzepi’s food; by the modest, collaborative gestalt of Danish life; by the lowkey people and their response to the Northern European summertime; by the urban bliss of Copenhagen itself … The episode isn’t just a hip, caustic, knowledgeable, run-and-gun visit to a city and a restaurant, although it’s that too. It’s a vision of civilization at its finest. There are moments in the show of such intense beauty, pleasure and connection that they feel downright transcendent. It’s fun and touching to watch the hardboiled Bourdain and his rowdy crew find ways to be frank and expressive about how moved and transported he was.

Speaking of expressive … Is anyone else as surprised as I am that more hasn’t been made of Anthony Bourdain as a filmmaker? God knows he hasn’t suffered from a lack of appreciation or success generally. But I’m a little shocked that film critics haven’t recognized what an innovative, daring and kickass moviemaker he is. I see Peckinpah, Renoir and Chris Marker (and more) in his work. Once he got his skills and crew in place, Bourdain started making show after show on a very high aesthetic level. He’s found ways not just to do New Journalism in TV form but to convey and express ideas, reflections and experiences. Talk about direct personal filmmaking …  Film critics and film visionaries used to enjoy discussing what was then called “le caméra-stylo” — the “camera-pen.” The dream was of a time when we’d have filmmakers who create with the kind of directness and freedom that the best essayists have enjoyed and made use of. It seems to me that, in Anthony Bourdain, we have exactly that. If these things were up to me — and thank god they’re not — I’d rank Bourdain right up there with the filmmaking superheroes of the 1960s and 1970s.

Related

  • “Noma: My Perfect Storm” is currently available on Netflix Instant.
  • I watched the Bourdain episode on YouTube, but the upload I found has been taken down. Currently you can see a mangled version of it here.
  • I wrote about Bourdain’s superb episode about Ferran Adrià here. Adrià was one of Redzepi’s influences.
Posted in Food and health, Movies | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

“Uncle” Sang as Peasants Sing

Fabrizio del Wrongo writes:

natashas-dance

“Uncle” led the visitors through the anteroom into a small hall with a folding table and red chairs, then into the drawing room with a round birchwood table and a sofa, and finally into his private room where there was a tattered sofa, a worn carpet, and portraits of Suvorov, of the host’s father and mother, and of himself in military uniform. The study smelt strongly of tobacco and dogs. “Uncle” asked his visitors to sit down and make themselves at home, and then went out of the room. Rugay, his back still muddy, came into the room and lay down on the sofa, cleaning himself with his tongue and teeth. Leading from the study was a passage in which a partition with ragged curtains could be seen. From behind this came women’s laughter and whispers. Natasha, Nicholas, and Petya took off their wraps and sat down on the sofa. Petya, leaning on his elbow, fell asleep at once. Natasha and Nicholas were silent. Their faces glowed, they were hungry and very cheerful. They looked at one another (now that the hunt was over and they were in the house, Nicholas no longer considered it necessary to show his manly superiority over his sister), Natasha gave him a wink, and neither refrained long from bursting into a peal of ringing laughter even before they had a pretext ready to account for it.

After a while “Uncle” came in, in a Cossack coat, blue trousers, and small top boots. And Natasha felt that this costume, the very one she had regarded with surprise and amusement at Otradnoe, was just the right thing and not at all worse than a swallow-tail or frock coat. “Uncle” too was in high spirits and far from being offended by the brother’s and sister’s laughter (it could never enter his head that they might be laughing at his way of life) he himself joined in the merriment.

“That’s right, young countess, that’s it, come on! I never saw anyone like her!” said he, offering Nicholas a pipe with a long stem and, with a practiced motion of three fingers, taking down another that had been cut short. “She’s ridden all day like a man, and is as fresh as ever!

Soon after “Uncle’s” reappearance the door was opened, evidently from the sound by a barefooted girl, and a stout, rosy, good-looking woman of about forty, with a double chin and full red lips, entered carrying a large loaded tray. With hospitable dignity and cordiality in her glance and in every motion, she looked at the visitors and, with a pleasant smile, bowed respectfully. In spite of her exceptional stoutness, which caused her to protrude her chest and stomach and throw back her head, this woman (who was “Uncle’s” housekeeper) trod very lightly. She went to the table, set down the tray, and with her plump white hands deftly took from it the bottles and various hors d’oeuvres and dishes and arranged them on the table. When she had finished, she stepped aside and stopped at the door with a smile on her face. “Here I am. I am she! Now do you understand ‘Uncle’?” her expression said to Rostov. How could one help understanding? Not only Nicholas, but even Natasha understood the meaning of his puckered brow and the happy complacent smile that slightly puckered his lips when Anisya Fedorovna entered. On the tray was a bottle of herb wine, different kinds of vodka, pickled mushrooms, rye cakes made with buttermilk, honey in the comb, still mead and sparkling mead, apples, nuts (raw and roasted), and nut-and-honey sweets. Afterwards she brought a freshly roasted chicken, ham, preserves made with honey, and preserves made with sugar.

All this was the fruit of Anisya Fedorovna’s housekeeping, gathered and prepared by her. The smell and taste of it all had a smack of Anisya Fedorovna herself: a savor of juiciness, cleanliness, whiteness, and pleasant smiles.

“Take this, little Lady-Countess!” she kept saying, as she offered Natasha first one thing and then another.

Natasha ate of everything and thought she had never seen or eaten such buttermilk cakes, such aromatic jam, such honey-and-nut sweets, or such a chicken anywhere. Anisya Fedorovna left the room.

After supper, over their cherry brandy, Rostov and “Uncle” talked of past and future hunts, of Rugay and Ilagin’s dogs, while Natasha sat upright on the sofa and listened with sparkling eyes. She tried several times to wake Petya that he might eat something, but he only muttered incoherent words without waking up. Natasha felt so lighthearted and happy in these novel surroundings that she only feared the trap would come for her too soon. After a casual pause, such as often occurs when receiving friends for the first time in one’s own house, “Uncle,” answering a thought that was in his visitors’ mind, said:

“This, you see, is how I am finishing my days… Death will come. That’s it, come on! Nothing will remain. Then why harm anyone?”

“Uncle’s” face was very significant and even handsome as he said this. Involuntarily Rostov recalled all the good he had heard about him from his father and the neighbors. Throughout the whole province “Uncle” had the reputation of being the most honorable and disinterested of cranks. They called him in to decide family disputes, chose him as executor, confided secrets to him, elected him to be a justice and to other posts; but he always persistently refused public appointments, passing the autumn and spring in the fields on his bay gelding, sitting at home in winter, and lying in his overgrown garden in summer.

“Why don’t you enter the service, Uncle?”

“I did once, but gave it up. I am not fit for it. That’s it, come on! I can’t make head or tail of it. That’s for you- I haven’t brains enough. Now, hunting is another matter- that’s it, come on! Open the door, there!” he shouted. “Why have you shut it?”

The door at the end of the passage led to the huntsmen’s room, as they called the room for the hunt servants.

There was a rapid patter of bare feet, and an unseen hand opened the door into the huntsmen’s room, from which came the clear sounds of a balalayka on which someone, who was evidently a master of the art, was playing. Natasha had been listening to those strains for some time and now went out into the passage to hear better.

“That’s Mitka, my coachman…. I have got him a good balalayka. I’m fond of it,” said “Uncle.”

It was the custom for Mitka to play the balalayka in the huntsmen’s room when “Uncle” returned from the chase. “Uncle” was fond of such music.

“How good! Really very good!” said Nicholas with some unintentional superciliousness, as if ashamed to confess that the sounds pleased him very much.

“Very good?” said Natasha reproachfully, noticing her brother’s tone. “Not ‘very good’ it’s simply delicious!”

Just as “Uncle’s” pickled mushrooms, honey, and cherry brandy had seemed to her the best in the world, so also that song, at that moment, seemed to her the acme of musical delight.

“More, please, more!” cried Natasha at the door as soon as the balalayka ceased. Mitka tuned up afresh, and recommenced thrumming the balalayka to the air of My Lady, with trills and variations. “Uncle” sat listening, slightly smiling, with his head on one side. The air was repeated a hundred times. The balalayka was retuned several times and the same notes were thrummed again, but the listeners did not grow weary of it and wished to hear it again and again. Anisya Fedorovna came in and leaned her portly person against the doorpost.

“You like listening?” she said to Natasha, with a smile extremely like “Uncle’s.” “That’s a good player of ours,” she added.

“He doesn’t play that part right!” said “Uncle” suddenly, with an energetic gesture. “Here he ought to burst out- that’s it, come on!- ought to burst out.”

“Do you play then?” asked Natasha.

“Uncle” did not answer, but smiled.

“Anisya, go and see if the strings of my guitar are all right. I haven’t touched it for a long time. That’s it- come on! I’ve given it up.”

Anisya Fedorovna, with her light step, willingly went to fulfill her errand and brought back the guitar.

Without looking at anyone, “Uncle” blew the dust off it and, tapping the case with his bony fingers, tuned the guitar and settled himself in his armchair. He took the guitar a little above the fingerboard, arching his left elbow with a somewhat theatrical gesture, and, with a wink at Anisya Fedorovna, struck a single chord, pure and sonorous, and then quietly, smoothly, and confidently began playing in very slow time, not My Lady, but the well-known song: Came a maiden down the street. The tune, played with precision and in exact time, began to thrill in the hearts of Nicholas and Natasha, arousing in them the same kind of sober mirth as radiated from Anisya Fedorovna’s whole being. Anisya Fedorovna flushed, and drawing her kerchief over her face went laughing out of the room. “Uncle” continued to play correctly, carefully, with energetic firmness, looking with a changed and inspired expression at the spot where Anisya Fedorovna had just stood. Something seemed to be laughing a little on one side of his face under his gray mustaches, especially as the song grew brisker and the time quicker and when, here and there, as he ran his fingers over the strings, something seemed to snap.

“Lovely, lovely! Go on, Uncle, go on!” shouted Natasha as soon as he had finished. She jumped up and hugged and kissed him. “Nicholas, Nicholas!” she said, turning to her brother, as if asking him: “What is it moves me so?”

Nicholas too was greatly pleased by “Uncle’s” playing, and “Uncle” played the piece over again. Anisya Fedorovna’s smiling face reappeared in the doorway and behind hers other faces…

    Fetching water clear and sweet,
    Stop, dear maiden, I entreat-

played “Uncle” once more, running his fingers skillfully over the strings, and then he stopped short and jerked his shoulders.

“Go on, Uncle dear,” Natasha wailed in an imploring tone as if her life depended on it.

“Uncle” rose, and it was as if there were two men in him: one of them smiled seriously at the merry fellow, while the merry fellow struck a naive and precise attitude preparatory to a folk dance.

“Now then, niece!” he exclaimed, waving to Natasha the hand that had just struck a chord.

Natasha threw off the shawl from her shoulders, ran forward to face “Uncle,” and setting her arms akimbo also made a motion with her shoulders and struck an attitude.

Where, how, and when had this young countess, educated by an emigree French governess, imbibed from the Russian air she breathed that spirit and obtained that manner which the pas de chale would, one would have supposed, long ago have effaced? But the spirit and the movements were those inimitable and unteachable Russian ones that “Uncle” had expected of her. As soon as she had struck her pose, and smiled triumphantly, proudly, and with sly merriment, the fear that had at first seized Nicholas and the others that she might not do the right thing was at an end, and they were already admiring her.

She did the right thing with such precision, such complete precision, that Anisya Fedorovna, who had at once handed her the handkerchief she needed for the dance, had tears in her eyes, though she laughed as she watched this slim, graceful countess, reared in silks and velvets and so different from herself, who yet was able to understand all that was in Anisya and in Anisya’s father and mother and aunt, and in every Russian man and woman.

“Well, little countess; that’s it- come on!” cried “Uncle,” with a joyous laugh, having finished the dance. “Well done, niece! Now a fine young fellow must be found as husband for you. That’s it- come on!”

“He’s chosen already,” said Nicholas smiling.

“Oh?” said “Uncle” in surprise, looking inquiringly at Natasha, who nodded her head with a happy smile.

“And such a one!” she said. But as soon as she had said it a new train of thoughts and feelings arose in her. “What did Nicholas’ smile mean when he said ‘chosen already’? Is he glad of it or not? It is as if he thought my Bolkonski would not approve of or understand our gaiety. But he would understand it all. Where is he now?” she thought, and her face suddenly became serious. But this lasted only a second. “Don’t dare to think about it,” she said to herself, and sat down again smilingly beside “Uncle,” begging him to play something more.

“Uncle” played another song and a valse; then after a pause he cleared his throat and sang his favorite hunting song:

    As 'twas growing dark last night
    Fell the snow so soft and light...

“Uncle” sang as peasants sing, with full and naive conviction that the whole meaning of a song lies in the words and that the tune comes of itself, and that apart from the words there is no tune, which exists only to give measure to the words. As a result of this the unconsidered tune, like the song of a bird, was extraordinarily good. Natasha was in ecstasies over “Uncle’s” singing. She resolved to give up learning the harp and to play only the guitar. She asked “Uncle” for his guitar and at once found the chords of the song.

After nine o’clock two traps and three mounted men, who had been sent to look for them, arrived to fetch Natasha and Petya. The count and countess did not know where they were and were very anxious, said one of the men.

Petya was carried out like a log and laid in the larger of the two traps. Natasha and Nicholas got into the other. “Uncle” wrapped Natasha up warmly and took leave of her with quite a new tenderness. He accompanied them on foot as far as the bridge that could not be crossed, so that they had to go round by the ford, and he sent huntsmen to ride in front with lanterns.

“Good-by, dear niece,” his voice called out of the darkness- not the voice Natasha had known previously, but the one that had sung As ’twas growing dark last night.

In the village through which they passed there were red lights and a cheerful smell of smoke.

“What a darling Uncle is!” said Natasha, when they had come out onto the highroad.

“Yes,” returned Nicholas. “You’re not cold?”

“No. I’m quite, quite all right. I feel so comfortable!” answered Natasha, almost perplexed by her feelings. They remained silent a long while. The night was dark and damp. They could not see the horses, but only heard them splashing through the unseen mud.

What was passing in that receptive childlike soul that so eagerly caught and assimilated all the diverse impressions of life? How did they all find place in her? But she was very happy. As they were nearing home she suddenly struck up the air of As ’twas growing dark last night- the tune of which she had all the way been trying to get and had at last caught.

“Got it?” said Nicholas.

“What were you thinking about just now, Nicholas?” inquired Natasha.

They were fond of asking one another that question.

“I?” said Nicholas, trying to remember. “Well, you see, first I thought that Rugay, the red hound, was like Uncle, and that if he were a man he would always keep Uncle near him, if not for his riding, then for his manner. What a good fellow Uncle is! Don’t you think so?… Well, and you?”

“I? Wait a bit, wait…. Yes, first I thought that we are driving along and imagining that we are going home, but that heaven knows where we are really going in the darkness, and that we shall arrive and suddenly find that we are not in Otradnoe, but in Fairyland. And then I thought… No, nothing else.”

“I know, I expect you thought of him,” said Nicholas, smiling as Natasha knew by the sound of his voice.

“No,” said Natasha, though she had in reality been thinking about Prince Andrew at the same time as of the rest, and of how he would have liked “Uncle.” “And then I was saying to myself all the way, ‘How well Anisya carried herself, how well!'” And Nicholas heard her spontaneous, happy, ringing laughter. “And do you know,” she suddenly said, “I know that I shall never again be as happy and tranquil as I am now.”

“Rubbish, nonsense, humbug!” exclaimed Nicholas, and he thought: “How charming this Natasha of mine is! I have no other friend like her and never shall have. Why should she marry? We might always drive about together!

“What a darling this Nicholas of mine is!” thought Natasha.

“Ah, there are still lights in the drawingroom!” she said, pointing to the windows of the house that gleamed invitingly in the moist velvety darkness of the night.

— Leo Tolstoy, as translated by Aylmer and Louise Maude

Posted in Books Publishing and Writing | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Juxtaposin’: Old Spice

Fabrizio del Wrongo writes:

Posted in Sex, Television | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Naked Ladies of the Week: Girls of Abby Winters

Fabrizio del Wrongo writes:

aw-cover

Started in 2000, the warts-and-all porn site Abby Winters is now something of an institution. It’s also  a throwback to the days when the internet was full of idiosyncratic outfits specializing in nude content. Now it often seems as though all internet porn either derives from a handful of gatekeepers or is self-posted by its subjects. Sigh. Is there no aspect of life that isn’t prone to increasing centralization?

The site’s PR has always held that it’s pro-female, body-positive, and all-natural. I think we can take that PR at face value despite the suggestion that its eponymous creator, supposedly a woman intent on deglamorizing porn, is entirely fictional. The site’s models always seem to be having fun. And, perhaps because the photographer has taken pains to include the girls in the porn-making process, they always seem wonderfully present. The photography, for its part, does a good job of evoking funkiness and the rumpled, unhurried eroticism of an amatory summer afternoon.

Below I’ve presented for your delectation three AW models who strike my fancy. They’re named, in order of appearance, Annabella, Giselle, and McKenzie. Many more can be found at AbbyWinters.com.

Nudity below. Enjoy the weekend.

Continue reading

Posted in Photography, Sex | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Song Du Jour: “Blue Yodel No. 9”

Blowhard, Esq. writes:

Ralph Peer — record producer, recording engineer, and talent scout — is one of the most influential men in the history of American music. Not only did he supervise the recording of Mamie Smith’s “Crazy Blues,” the song credited with kicking off America’s blue craze, he discovered Jimmie Rodgers and the Carter Family, two of the most important acts in the history of country music AND he signed Louis Armstrong to his first record deal as bandleader, a contract that produced the legendary Hot Fives and Sevens. Despite these accomplishments, Peer never cared for blues, jazz, or country music, dismissing them as “hillbilly and nigger stuff.”

This song, recorded in Los Angeles in 1930, is the result of a session put together by Peer when he was producing country songs for Victor Records. Jimmie Rodgers, the father of country music, is backed up by Louis Armstrong, the father of jazz, on trumpet and Armstrong’s wife Lil on piano (Louis was estranged from Lil at the time and it would be the last record they made together). In Pops, his Armstrong biography, Terry Teachout writes:

Neither Armstrong is credited on the label of “Blue Yodel No. 9,” but their joint presence is unmistakable. Louis fires off a no-nonsense introduction, and Lil supports him in her best barrelhouse style. Then Rogers enters, telling one his timeless tales of romantic mischance, complete with yodeling. The accent may be of a hillbilly from Mississippi, but the sensibility is straight out of Storyville [the infamous New Orleans slum where Armstrong was born and raised], and Armstrong backs up Rodgers with the same downhome fills he had supplied for Bessie Smith and Ma Rainey. like other country-blues singers, Rodgers freely dropped and inserted beats at will: the last stanza of “Blue Yodel No. 9” consists of three bars in 4/4 time, a bar of 2/4, two more bars of 4/4, and another 2/4 bar, after which the singer continues to switch unpredictably between two and four. But the Armstrongs followed him without too much difficulty, and the resulting performance was far more than a cross-cultural novelty. Not that Louis’s ability to adapt to Rodger’s style should have come as a surprise: the record collection with which he traveled in later years contained everything from Bix [Beiderbecke] and Bing [Crosby] to Bartók’s Concerto for Orchestra. In 1970 he would startle his purist fans by recording an album of country songs. “No change for me, daddy, I was doing the same kind of work forty years ago,” he blithely told a friend.

One thing that Teachout overlooks is that Rodgers’s yodeling, as explained by Nick Tosches in Where Dead Voices Gather, can be traced to the influence of the minstrel singer Emmett Miller. So, in one performance, two of American music’s most important figures combine four strands — minstrelsy, jazz, blues, and country — into one remarkable song.

Posted in Music | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

21st Century Films

Fenster writes:

The dog ate my homework and I did not post to the recent UR list of the best turd-free films of the 21st Century.  Here’s my list, and it makes no pretense to best though they are pretty much my favorites.  For the most part the list is culled from my 5-star ratings on Movie Lens, which I have usually found a better predictive tool for personal preference than Netflix or other engines.

We don’t make a fetish of it here at UR but let’s face it we are a pretty diverse crowd and it shows in the film lists.  While tastes differ there is of course an underying unity of sorts in the selections, as it should be.

nda-blog-top-copy

UR: Unity in Diversity Award Winner

Interesting to note that Lonergan’s Margaret shows up on all five lists.  And mulitple sightings of Oslo, August 31st; Summer Hours, Before Sunset, and Black Book.  Several listed Enter the Void while I listed Touching the Void.  No one picked Fill the Void, Beyond the Void, Call of the Void, or Pop Meets the Void.

In no particular order, and not limited to 20, and with links to a Fenster UR post as appropriate:

pictures1

Margaret (Lonergan, 2011)
Bone Tomahawk (Zahler, 2015)
Touching the Void (Macdonald, 2003)
Before Sunset/Midnight (double feature) (Linklater, 2004/2013)
A.I. (Spielberg, 2001)
A Late Quartet (Zilberman, 2012)
Children of Men (Cuarón, 2006)
Sin City (Miller, Rodriguez, Tarantino, 2005)
A Serious Man (Coen Brothers, 2009)
Clouds of Sils Maria (Assayas, 2014)
Anomalisa (Johnson and Kaufman, 2015)
Going Clear (Gibney, 2015)
A Prairie Home Companion (Altman, 2006)
Foxcatcher (Miller, 2014)
The Place Beyond the Pines (Cianfrance, 2012)
Stories We Tell (Polley, 2012)
The Big Short (McKay, 2015)
A Royal Affair (Arcel, 2012)
Oslo, August 31st (Trier, 2011)
Summer Hours (Assayas, 2008)
Notes on a Scandal (Eyre, 2006)
Superbad (Mottola, 2007)
Black Book (Verhoeven, 2006)
In the Mood for Love (Kar-Wei Wong, 2000)
House of Sand and Fog (Perelman, 2003)

recently-updated6

Posted in Movies | Tagged | 4 Comments

Random Images

Sir Barken Hyena writes:

I’ve been browsing through the last few years of photos in my image folders, and plucked a few out for your potential enjoyment.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment