Official Buildings, Old vs. New

Paleo Retiree writes:

As I was scrolling through some pics I snapped during a trip the Question Lady and I took through the Midwest a few years ago, I was struck — for about the zillionth time — by the contrast between the buildings our elites used to build for us and the ones they inflict on us these days. Let me illustrate. Some old official buildings from the Midwest:

midwest_indianapolis_2012_05_arch01

midwest_des_moines_2012_05_arch_civic_center_bldg_polly01

midwest_bloomington_2012_05_arch_indiana_u_polly01

Hey, you get a glimpse of the Question Lady in a few of those shots. Cool.

Now a sampling of far-more-recent official buildings:

midwest_bloomington_2012_05_arch_police_hq01

midwest_des_moines_2012_05_arch_new_library01

midwest_bloomington_2012_05_arch_library01

When and why did our elites start erecting dreary structures? Part of the rationale for the new concrete-and-glass shoebox style is that it’s more accessible and democratic — it’s literally more leveled-out. Does that rationale work for you? Or is it bullshit? Do the new-style (ie., modernist concrete/glass shoeboxes) buildings express more or less respect for everyday people than the older buildings do?

Posted in Architecture | Tagged , , | 21 Comments

Medieval Scholasticism and Legal Reasoning

Blowhard, Esq. writes:

uofb

University of Bologna by Laurentius de Voltolina, c. 1350

Common-law legal reasoning, or the method by which lawyers and judges analyze a problem, has roots that stretch back almost 1,000 years to the educational method known as Scholasticism. Before we get to exactly what Scholasticism is, though, it’s important to know a little about Monasticism, the type of learning it replaced.

Monastic learning was passive by design. One was not supposed to question the Biblical text or writings of the Church fathers. Monks sat quietly and listened during their mealtimes as someone read to them. Didn’t understand a point? Had a question? Too bad. Monastic vows usually prohibited speaking. The point wasn’t to assert your will — the point was to obliterate it. (Sounds a bit like undergrad education today, if you ask me.)

The favored genre of Monastic learning was Biblical commentary. Commentators would gloss a text line by line, word by word, speculating on the spiritual significance of what they read. While these commentaries were restricted by the text, they were also meditative, associative, and stream of consciousness. There wasn’t much logical organization to these Monastic glosses, so the monks sort of just ramble on.

medievalstudents

The Scholastics, on the other hand, approached things quite differently. While Monasticism was a product of the rural, contemplative countryside, Scholasticism arose in the towns and cities that were thriving during the Commercial Revolution. The Scholastics emerged from milieu in which people were quite comfortable speaking, haggling, and arguing — they sought out conflict.

As for the method itself, the Scholastics started with a question, for example, “Is it ever permissible to lie?” They would then comb through the recognized authorities — the Bible, texts of the Church fathers, Church communications, Papal letters, the pagan philosophers — looking for points of agreement and disagreement. The next step was the juxtaposition of these authorities, lining them up pro and con. Then, via a dialectical process, they would reconcile the authorities, arguing that if you looked closely, they actually didn’t disagree at all. This reconciliation was accomplished in two ways: 1) via philological analysis (the Scholastics loved to split hairs over the meaning of words) and 2) via logical, formal analysis.

commonpleas

The Scholastic method should sound awfully familiar to any lawyers in the audience because this is exactly how modern legal reasoning works, as well as providing the basic blueprint of judicial appellate opinions. An appellate opinion usually begins with the “question presented,” i.e. the legal issue to be determined. Then, the judges review the controlling legal authorities — decisions of prior courts that have ruled on similar issues, influential law review articles, treatises, etc. If there is a direct conflict among the authorities, the judges will do their best, via philological analysis and formal logic, to synthesize and reconcile the conflict. Most United States Supreme Court decisions follow this model — the Justices are not usually deciding a novel legal issue, they’re trying to reconcile a conflict between two different federal appellate jurisdictions who are coming to opposite outcomes on the same issue.

Related

Posted in History, Law, Philosophy and Religion | Tagged , , , , | 3 Comments

L.A. Burrito Blogging Part 1: Super Mex

Blowhard, Esq. writes:

The site LAist just released its list of the best burritos in Los Angeles. PR decided there was a disturbing lack of food blogging around here, so I’ve been sent on assignment to evaluate their findings. Hey, no problem, happy to oblige and besides, one of the joints on the list is a regular lunch place of mine. So without further ado, let’s check out Super Mex located at 4711 East 2nd Street in Long Beach, CA.

smsignracistUgh, super racist logo.

smmenuWhenever I eat here I get the carne asada one, but LAist recommends the carnitas, so that’s what I’m ordering.

smchipsnsalsaWhether you order it to go (at a little place next door) or dine in, you get chips ‘n salsa, por supesto. The salsa is very tasty — nice consistency, spicy but not too hot. The staff is good about refilling it promptly, too.

smburritoThe main course. As the menu says, the burrito contains meat, refried beans, rice and lettuce topped with red sauce, two kinds of cheese, and guacamole.

smburrito2Being a wet burrito, you need a knife and fork to eat it.

So how is it? It’s pretty solid. There’s a generous portion of meat and the red sauce has a nice touch of sweetness. A lot of food too, as you can see, so it’s quite filling. However, the rice and beans are average and the guacamole is a bit thin. (Personal preference, but I don’t like tomatoes in my guac. Most tomatoes are little more than watery cardboard.) Also, the lettuce in the burrito doesn’t add much — the only thing pleasant about iceberg lettuce is the crunch but it gets steamed by the hot contents and goes limp. Nitpicking aside, though, it’s a fine wrap. But one of the best in L.A.? Hmmm, we’ll see about that…

Oh, on my way back to the office I came across Super Mex’s food truck, which I didn’t even know they had. I guess these things are required by law now.

smfoodtruck

Related

  • I wrote about an epic meal in Vegas here.
  • Lloyd’s red beans and rice has become a Sunday tradition for me.
  • I made an excellent split pea soup today and feel compelled to share the recipe.

peasoup

Split Pea Soup

Prep time: About 2 hours
Makes about 3 quarts

Ingredients:

1 pound split peas
1 ham hock
1 large onion, diced
3-4 carrots, sliced
3-4 celery stalks, chopped
1 large potato, cubed
3-4 garlic cloves, minced
8 cups of chicken stock (I used two containers of Pacific brand chicken stock, which I think is the best)
1 sprig rosemary, minced
A few sprigs of thyme, minced
Extra virgin olive oil
Kosher salt
Pepper

Directions:
1. Cover the ham hock in water, bring to a boil, then simmer for 45 mins. Dump the water, set the ham aside to cool.
2. In large pot, sweat the onions, garlic, and herbs in the olive oil over medium heat until the onions are translucent, about 10-15 mins.
3. Add the chicken stock, carrots, celery, potato, and half the peas. Bring to a boil, then simmer for 40 mins. Make sure to stir occasionally.
4. While the soup is simmering, cut and cube the meat off the ham hock. Set aside.
5. Add the rest of the peas and the cubed ham. Simmer another 40 mins.
6. Season with salt and pepper to taste.

Posted in Food and health, The Good Life | Tagged , , , , , , | 10 Comments

The Skills Some People Develop

Paleo Retiree writes:

Was trickery (CGI? editing tomfoolery?) involved, can anyone tell? In any case, I want to point out what a shrewdly constructed little piece of entertainment this 37 second long, all-in-one-shot clip is. Here’s how it goes:

  • Closeup of Punk Assistant eyeing the camera. She’s a striking combo of blonde, hot pink, and attitude.
  • She gives a flounce, then turns and walks away from the camera. She plants herself, once again facing the camera, about 15 feet away, her arms wrapped around her, her hands holding ping pong paddles raised oddly to her sides. The surface of the paddles is coal black.
  • At the same moment she takes her stance, Knife Guy steps into frame from the left. He’s in bright blue, quite a contrast to the girl’s pink. He’s eyeing the camera in that “masterly” way magicians often do, and he’s stroking two big, dangerous-looking knives against each other as though sharpening them.
  • At that same moment, about five feet behind the girl, an arm (dressed in a blue that matches Knife Guy’s) extends out from a doorway at head level, holding a pineapple — a nice Magritte-like touch as well as a foreshadowing.
  • Note as well how effectively the pinks and blues stand out against the stained cream colors of the setting.
  • Knife Guy puts one of the knives in his mouth and pulls a ping pong paddle from his back pocket. Its visible surface is black.
  • Knife Guy whacks the one knife with the ping pong paddle — who saw that coming?
  • Punk Assistant opens one arm and “catches” the knife with one of her paddles. As this happens, Older Male Assistant leans into the image from his doorway. The side of the girl’s paddle the knife sticks into is bright red — one of many striking surprises in the clip. Punk Assistant maintains her surly deadpan.
  • Thwack: same thing, other side.
  • The moment the second knife nails its paddle, Older Male Assistant walks up to Punk Assistant. As he positions the pineapple over her head, Knife Guy withdraws yet another knife (from his belt) with a little flourish, and gives the camera another “masterly” look. He isn’t really going to do what we fear/expect him to do, is he?
  • Yes he is, and he does. The top of the pineapple flies away.
  • Older Male Assistant withdraws the pineapple from above Punk Assistant’s head and stands quietly as Knife Guy brings out one further unexpected prop: an actual ping pong ball. After all the knives-and-pineapple craziness, we’re back to where we started.
  • Thwack — and the pingpong ball flies straight into Punk Assistant’s mouth.
  • There’s a nicely-judged pause for effect.
  • Punk Assistant lets the pingpong ball drop out of her mouth at the same instant Knife Guy turns to us and gives us a thumbs-up sign.
  • Random Passerby descends the stairs. He’s in nondescript jeans and jacket. The performers hold their poses as he makes his way by.

I could be wrong, but among other things I’m seeing two Rules of Three going on here. In one of them, we’re given a Prologue (girl, pineapple and Knife Guy set themselves up — an introduction), an Action (the stunts), and a Coda. And embedded within the Action act itself is another example of the Rule of Three: 1) first knife; 2) second knife; 3) Climax (pineapple); and 3.5) Coda/wrapup/return-to-origin (ping pong ball).

Hats off to whoever worked this act up, and staged, designed and shot it — as well as, of course, to the performers. It’s just a handheld, 37-second-long clip, but real thought, skill and preparation went into it. And thanks to co-blogger epiminondas for turning up this brilliant little clip.

Here’s some more ping pong amazingness.

Posted in Movies, The Good Life | Tagged , , , , | 7 Comments

Prison/School

Paleo Retiree writes:

Which is the prison, which is the school?

blog_prison_or_school01

blog_prison_or_school02

Shouldn’t the architecture be giving us more of a hint than it is? And why do we sentence children to spend many years of long days in buildings that might as well be prisons?

Posted in Architecture, Education | Tagged , , , | 4 Comments

Linkage

Paleo Retiree writes:

Posted in Linkathons | Tagged , , , , , | 3 Comments

“Penny Flame’s Expert Guide to Rough Sex”

Paleo Retiree writes:

penny-flame-rough-sex

A Vivid production written, hosted, and directed by a young porn star, the short dark-haired beauty Penny Flame. It’s a mildly interesting, mildly amusing, and mildly hot watch. Rough sex here mostly seems to mean spanking, choking, D/S games, slapping, and working up a sweat. Penny explains and demos a few techniques, then it’s on to some scenes between porn stars enacting rough sexual encounters.

lexi01

Lexi Belle was the revelation for me, a teeny-tiny cutiepie in the Pia Zadora mode who seems to have a genuine lust for being dominated, and especially for being choked. She’s a gorgeous looker and a lively reactor, and her scene (with the very confident Mark Davis) was both hot and disturbing. Gadzooks, some people really do these things?

Style-and-filmmaking-wise, the disc is low-budget, trying-to-make-a-virtue-of-not-being-very-slick, and affably dopey — Penny pops up during scenes as a devil and an angel, for instance, to pass along lessons and corrections. The porn stuff isn’t nearly as sophisticated or edgy as what’s produced by Kink.com; it’s bright, over-made-up, and turquoise and pink and very shiny (though I’m guessing that the usual fratboy crowd will find it a lot edgier than what they usually watch). Still: appreciated. And what a discovery Lexi Belle is. She can be found doing far-out things at Kink.com (NSFW to the max) too.

Posted in Movies, Sex, The Good Life | Tagged , , , , , | 5 Comments

Metaphysics

Paleo Retiree writes:

Some answers to one of life’s greatest Eternal Questions: How do you turn a half-volley into a weapon of war?

For best viewing, put it on 720p and blow it up to full-screen.

Posted in The Good Life | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Quote Du Jour

Paleo Retiree writes:

“Whether we like buildings as pure formal objects is another matter, and not of primary significance. What is truly significant is whether architecture creates a place.”

Link.

Posted in Architecture | Tagged , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Linkage

Fabrizio del Wrongo writes:

  • Unleash the Beef shares the eulogy from his father’s funeral. It could almost serve as a eulogy for traditional American manhood.
  • Related.
  • Bring back the ’70s-style sex film!
  • This strikes me as one of the great Moldbug posts. A real mind bender.
  • According to Gregory Cochran, the Ashkenazi are significantly Italian in origin. Funny. I’ve always been amused by how similar New York Jews and Italians are.
  • Is anyone surprised that lesbian marriages break up more frequently than gay ones?
  • In general, I have a lot of sympathy for gals whose private sexy-time photos get spread across the internet. But this raises some interesting questions. For one thing: What qualifies as “porn”? For another: How to police the tons of random websites that (perhaps unknowingly?) post or end up hosting amateur porn shots culled from the internet? Seems like a real boondoggle to me.
Posted in Computers, Linkathons, Movies, Politics and Economics, Science, Sex | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment